Skip to main content

NASA drone traffic management tests take off in Reno

NASA and its partners are in the midst of testing the next, more complex version of its unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) traffic management (UTM) technologies with live, remotely-operated aircraft, or drones, at six different sites around the US.
May 30, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
NASA and its partners are in the midst of testing the next, more complex version of its unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) traffic management (UTM) technologies with live, remotely-operated aircraft, or drones, at six different sites around the US.


The three-week campaign, known as Technology Capability Level 2 (TCL2) National Campaign, began 9 May and is focused on flying small drones beyond the pilot’s visual line of sight over sparsely populated areas near six of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) test sites.

For TCL2, participants are interacting with the UTM research platform by entering their drone’s scheduled flight plans. The UTM system then checks for conflicts, approves or rejects the plan and notifies users of any potential constraints.

Meanwhile, engineers at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley monitor operations and system load and gather qualitative feedback to identify opportunities to expand capability and further refine the UTM working models.

This mixing of actual flights with virtual flights provides additional insight for future tests and helps to further refine and improve the UTM concept.

As part of the testing, the drones are flying profiles that simulate real-world uses for the aircraft, such as package deliveries, farmland surveys, infrastructure inspections, search and rescue missions and video surveillance operations.

Related Content

  • Voting for change - the democratisation of transportation
    December 8, 2014
    Contra Costa is using an innovative planning method to gather suggestions and craft future transportation spending plans. Public opinion in matters relating to transport rarely exceeds complaints about congestion on the roads, crowded metros, slow buses with ‘exorbitant’ fares or perhaps enforcement cameras.
  • Most pedestrian detection systems ‘hit pedestrians at 30mph’
    October 14, 2019
    In-car automatic emergency braking systems with pedestrian detection mostly fail to avoid hitting pedestrians - and are “completely ineffective at night”, according to new research. In shocking findings, the American Automobile Association (AAA) revealed that most systems hit a simulated pedestrian target at 30mph. A collision also occurred 89% of the time when a vehicle operating at 20mph encountered a child darting between two cars. In tests, all vehicles collided with an adult pedestrian immediately fo
  • Autonomous vehicles will not prevent half of real-world crashes
    April 5, 2017
    Alan Thomas of CAVT looks at the reality behind the safety claims fuelling the drive towards autonomous vehicles
  • Traffex snapshot reveals enforcement advances
    July 24, 2017
    An indication of just how far beyond spot speed and red light the enforcement sector has progressed was evident in the range of new and improved equipment on display at the recent Traffex event in Birmingham. One of the key trends, particularly in the UK but also evident elsewhere, is the increase in average speed enforcement, according to RedSpeed’s managing director Robert Ryan, who predicts a big increase in installations this year. “The price point has reached a level authorities can afford,” he says, a