MPs urge more investment in UK roads

Joined-up planning for both passenger and freight traffic across the UK’s road and rail infrastructure is crucial for future prosperity, warn MPs in two new reports. Effective regulation and long-term funding plans are essential for investment in the strategic road network.
May 8, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Joined-up planning for both passenger and freight traffic across the UK’s road and rail infrastructure is crucial for future prosperity, warn MPs in two new reports.

Effective regulation and long-term funding plans are essential for investment in the strategic road network.

These are key conclusions from two reports issued today by the Transport Committee - one examining the proposed planning policy framework for nationally significant road and rail infrastructure projects, the National Policy Statement on National Networks and the other examining the strategic road network in England.

Launching the two reports, Louise Ellman MP, chair of the Transport Committee, said that the 1837 Department for Transport (DfT) must look at future passenger and freight demand when planning for new road and rail investment. She also stressed the need for a more transparent system for road planning as part of a wider national transport strategy. This includes proper scrutiny of the DfT’s National Transport Model (NTM), which the Department has already conceded does not work well for forecasting London traffic and needs to be reviewed.

Investment will have to rise significantly over the next decade if traffic forecasts are correct, according to the committee. The committee noted that the need for greater investment will come at a time when the growing popularity of more fuel efficient vehicles will result in lower fuel duty tax revenues.

In the report looking at the strategic road network, the Committee concluded that, although it strongly supports the five-year funding plans being introduced for the 503 Highways Agency the case for establishing the Agency as a Government-owned company was not convincing. MPs called for a far stronger system of regulatory oversight than is currently proposed.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Road safety - the challenge ahead
    April 25, 2012
    More than 1.3 million people die in road accidents each year. If nothing is done, this already chilling figure risks to rise to 1.9 million deaths per year. Around 90 per cent of road fatalities occur in emerging and developing countries. Here, the mixture of population growth and higher numbers of vehicles due to rising incomes are proving a deadly combination, as infrastructure and regulatory environment have difficulty keeping pace.
    Read More
  • Average driver spends nearly £1,000 and wastes almost five days stuck in traffic a year
    August 18, 2017
    The average UK motorist is being forced to waste £968 and spend 4.9 days stuck in traffic on major roads each year because of congestion, according to new analysis by the Local Government Association (LGA) in its new report, A country in a jam: tackling congestion in our towns and cities. Travel speeds across the country’s local roads continue to decrease, with the average speed on ‘A’ roads now just 25.2 mph, one per cent slower than it was this time last year. Congestion also significantly contributes to
    Read More
  • US transportation policy needs to restart to sort shortcomings
    August 2, 2012
    Joshua Schank has no illusions when it comes to what he and the Bipartisan Policy Center are suggesting in Performance Driven: New Vision for US Transportation Policy. Released in June of this year, this major report (see Sidebar, 'The Shift in Thinking') advocates no less than a root-and-branch overhaul of the way in which the US transportation system is run - how money is allocated and how the beneficiaries of that funding are selected. As its name suggests, Schank and his colleagues are urging senior US
    Read More
  • Appeals against HS2 unanimously dismissed
    January 22, 2014
    The UK Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeals against the HS2 high speed rail line. Following a Court of Appeal ruling in which the government won on all seven areas of challenge, the Court of Appeal gave permission to appeal to the Supreme Court on two grounds: the claim that the government was required to comply with the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive, and failed to do so (this ground was led by HS2 Action Alliance, and supported by the Local Authorities and Heathrow Hu
    Read More

Highlighted Content