Skip to main content

Move NY Legislation introduced

A coalition of New York State Assembly Members has unveiled legislation that they say will not only fund Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) capital needs but will create a US$4.5 billion Transit Gap Investment Fund (TGIF) to expand public transit and improve accessibility for millions of New Yorkers, particularly those who live in so-called ‘transit deserts’. Introduced by Assembly Member Robert J. Rodriguez, chair of the subcommittee on infrastructure, and joined by 14 co-sponsors from across t
March 29, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
A coalition of New York State Assembly Members has unveiled legislation that they say will not only fund 1267 Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) capital needs but will create a US$4.5 billion Transit Gap Investment Fund (TGIF) to expand public transit and improve accessibility for millions of New Yorkers, particularly those who live in so-called ‘transit deserts’.

Introduced by Assembly Member Robert J. Rodriguez, chair of the subcommittee on infrastructure, and joined by 14 co-sponsors from across the city, if enacted the bill will raise US$1.35 billion in new annual revenue and, when bonded, will generate over US$12 billion for upgrading New York’s transit system and road and bridge network. In addition to the TGIF, the legislation could cover the US$7.3 billion in MTA capital needs and create a US$375 million annual revenue stream for maintaining the City’s roads and bridges.

The TGIF is specifically designed to expand service in parts of the City where there is no subway service and inadequate bus service.

Inter-borough projects to be considered by the board for approval include the Triboro Line subway connecting Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx; capital improvements on the G train; LIRR subway conversion between Brooklyn and Queens; new ferries and express bus service; Staten Island North Shore bus rapid transit; and new cycle and pedestrian lanes on the Verrazano and Brooklyn Bridges.

The legislation will earmark US$1 billion for local projects to be allocated equitably among Community Districts in all five boroughs. Each district will have US$15-$21 million to work with to make their transit hubs more accessible based on priority needs (e.g., repaired stairways, station elevators, bus shelters, Vision Zero street-scaping). In addition, a US$700 million Suburban County Transit Fund is established under the legislation, which county officials can use to subsidise county bus service and improve access to commuter rail by increasing parking capacity at select stations, adding shuttle service, and adopting other strategies for facilitating the use of LIRR and Metro North service.

The legislation is modelled after the Move NY Fair Plan, developed by transportation engineer ‘Gridlock’ Sam Schwartz and the Move NY coalition, which proposed lowering tolls on all MTA bridges – that connect areas where there tends to be less traffic and fewer transit options ¬– and restoring or adding tolls to crossings in areas where there’s more traffic and better transit options.

The legislation also locks in the ratio of newly lowered outer bridge tolls to the central business district tolls such that if the ratios were to be ignored in future toll setting, the new tolls on the central business district bridges and along 60th Street would automatically be revoked, thus guaranteeing that the ratio will not be violated. With the installation of gateless tolls and the reduction of traffic, vehicle travel speeds are estimated to improve by up to 20 per cent south of Central Park and up to eight per cent in areas outside the central business district – in Brooklyn, Queens and Northern Manhattan.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Better liveability through more micromobility
    November 1, 2022
    Shared and micromobility offer new options, weaning urbanites off their cars, stitching existing mass transit combinations together. Andrew Stone looks at a report on transforming our cities
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • Vehicle identification systems aid dynamic bus operations
    April 24, 2013
    David Crawford looks at a global trend towards more efficiency in less space As buses gain increased profile in the public transport mix needed for modal shift, attention is turning towards improving terminal layouts for more efficient handling of services and passengers. Locations, too, tend to be in central areas of cities, where sites are restricted and land values high. Enter the dynamic bus station, which uses modern vehicle identification systems to optimise space use and streamline service operation
  • Evidence growing for distance-based charging
    January 18, 2012
    The case is growing for an alternative to fuel taxation for funding highway infrastructure. A more sustainable system of mileage-based charging can be established in a way that is acceptable to the travelling public, writes Jack Opiola. Fuel tax - the lifeblood relied on for 80 years to maintain and improve roads and transit systems - is now in considerable jeopardy in the United States. Increased vehicle fuel efficiency and a poor economy already hamper generation of fuel tax revenue; now a recent federal