Skip to main content

Michigan senate approves repeal of motorcycle helmet law

AAA Michigan has said it strongly opposes legislation approved by the Michigan Senate late Wednesday (June 28) which, if approved by the House, would repeal Michigan's nearly four-decade old mandatory motorcycle helmet law.
April 19, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
4939 AAA Michigan has said it strongly opposes legislation approved by the Michigan Senate late Wednesday (June 28) which, if approved by the House, would repeal Michigan's nearly four-decade old mandatory motorcycle helmet law.

Senate Bill 291 - approved by a vote of 24 to 14 - allows individuals 21 years of age or older to ride without a helmet if they have a medical policy of US$100,000 in place. A sunset provision was also placed in the bill which would automatically repeal the helmet law four years after the effective date of the bill – unless the legislature acts again. The bill also requires the Department of State to perform a study of accidents, injuries and fatalities during those four years – if the bill becomes law.

AAA Michigan says that repealing the current law will result in more motorcycle fatalities and injuries and higher costs for all motorists. An Office of Highway Safety Planning analysis found that a repeal of the law would result in at least 30 additional motorcycle fatalities each year, along with 127 more incapacitating injuries and $129 million in additional economic costs to citizens.

The 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that in the three years after Florida's repeal of its mandatory helmet law there was an 81% increase in fatalities. According to 831 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) data, US states with either no helmet laws for motorcyclists or lax enforcement of helmet laws have without exception the highest fatality rates for motorcycle riders. Those US states with helmet laws and tough enforcement have the lowest fatality rates amongst motorcyclists. The previous US Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters is a keen motorcycle rider and voiced her opinions on the need for helmet laws on numerous occasions, attributing her survival from one motorcycle accident to her own use of personal protective gear including a helmet.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • New US fuel efficiency standards would cost over US$65 billion in lost revenue
    April 17, 2012
    Friday’s proposal by the Obama Administration to increase fuel efficiency standards for cars and light trucks to an average 54.5 miles per gallon (4.32 litres/100 km) between 2017 and 2025 would result in the loss of more than $65 billion in federal funding for state and local highway, bridge and transit improvements, an analysis by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) shows.
  • $49m for innovative ITS projects
    August 12, 2022
    Biden Administration awards cover transport and mobility projects and public transit
  • US adopts automated enforcement… gradually
    March 4, 2014
    The US automated enforcement market is in rude health as the number of systems and applications continues to grow and broaden. Jason Barnes reports. Blessed and cursed – arguably, in equal measure – with a constitution which stresses the right to self-expression and determination, the US has had a harder journey than most to the more widespread use of automated traffic enforcement systems. In some cases, opposition to the concept has been extreme – including the murder of a roadside civil enforcement offici
  • IBT goes roundabout in Bradenton, Florida
    May 10, 2019
    Yet another roundabout is being built in the US. The public remains sceptical but agencies and contractors are on board, writes David Arminas Global construction company IBT, based in Miami, has won a contract to install a traffic circle – or roundabout - on State Road 64 near Bradenton, Florida. The deal is part of a road improvement project with the Florida Department of Transportation (DoT). The 13-month project started in November. Worth only $5 million, it is not a big infrastructure contract. But