Skip to main content

Michigan senate approves repeal of motorcycle helmet law

AAA Michigan has said it strongly opposes legislation approved by the Michigan Senate late Wednesday (June 28) which, if approved by the House, would repeal Michigan's nearly four-decade old mandatory motorcycle helmet law.
April 19, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
4939 AAA Michigan has said it strongly opposes legislation approved by the Michigan Senate late Wednesday (June 28) which, if approved by the House, would repeal Michigan's nearly four-decade old mandatory motorcycle helmet law.

Senate Bill 291 - approved by a vote of 24 to 14 - allows individuals 21 years of age or older to ride without a helmet if they have a medical policy of US$100,000 in place. A sunset provision was also placed in the bill which would automatically repeal the helmet law four years after the effective date of the bill – unless the legislature acts again. The bill also requires the Department of State to perform a study of accidents, injuries and fatalities during those four years – if the bill becomes law.

AAA Michigan says that repealing the current law will result in more motorcycle fatalities and injuries and higher costs for all motorists. An Office of Highway Safety Planning analysis found that a repeal of the law would result in at least 30 additional motorcycle fatalities each year, along with 127 more incapacitating injuries and $129 million in additional economic costs to citizens.

The 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that in the three years after Florida's repeal of its mandatory helmet law there was an 81% increase in fatalities. According to 831 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) data, US states with either no helmet laws for motorcyclists or lax enforcement of helmet laws have without exception the highest fatality rates for motorcycle riders. Those US states with helmet laws and tough enforcement have the lowest fatality rates amongst motorcyclists. The previous US Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters is a keen motorcycle rider and voiced her opinions on the need for helmet laws on numerous occasions, attributing her survival from one motorcycle accident to her own use of personal protective gear including a helmet.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Enforcement comes in many guises
    June 22, 2016
    Colin Sowman looks at some enforcement case studies from around the world. It is a sad fact of life that unenforced laws are not adhered to by a sometimes sizable proportion of the public and once enforcement is seen to be lacking, some drivers can take this to extremes and authorities must decide how to regain control.
  • Enforcement needs automation and communication
    February 1, 2012
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf
  • Transport planning consultation is culturally important
    February 2, 2012
    Andrew Bardin Williams explores the efforts under way in North Dakota to consult with native tribes during the early stages of transportation project development. These efforts have led to the signing of a Programmatic Agreement between the state DOT and local tribes and the creation of a tribal consultation committee that allows Native Americans to advise on the identification, evaluation and treatment of historic properties, including those of religious and cultural significance
  • Reason Foundation makes a case for more toll lanes in southern California
    November 24, 2015
    S public policy think tank the Reason Foundation has unveiled a detailed long-range transportation plan to reduce the traffic congestion that has plagued southern California for decades. The Reason Foundation plan would decrease southern California’s infamous gridlock by creating a connected network of variably priced toll lanes on all of the region’s major highways and expressways