Skip to main content

Maryland to implement positive train control

In the wake of the December derailment of a New York passenger train that came off the tracks as it sped too fast into a turn, the Maryland Board of Public Works has approved a US$13 million contract to begin installing positive train control equipment, which uses GPS and radio signalling to react automatically if a collision or derailment is anticipated.
January 13, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
In the wake of the December derailment of a New York passenger train that came off the tracks as it sped too fast into a turn, the Maryland Board of Public Works has approved a US$13 million contract to begin installing positive train control equipment, which uses GPS and radio signalling to react automatically if a collision or derailment is anticipated.

The deadline for full implementation of the system is 2015, but costs and other issues are expected to delay this.

Two rail lines used by MARC commuter trains are owned and operated by the freight railroad 7561 CSX. A third is operated by 2008 Amtrak. Both CSX and Amtrak are installing and testing their own vast networks of switches, signals, radio and communication equipment and operations centres associated with the technology, the companies said.

CSX is years away from completing the work and told the Federal Railroad Administration that it was not going to meet the 2015 deadline, said Ken Lewis, director of positive train control for the railroad.

The company already has begun installing new computers, interfaces and other equipment on about 2,400 of 3,600 trains, and has replaced signalling equipment on 2,400 miles out of 7,500 miles of track needed to meet the deadline.

It will begin field-testing software in a few months on tracks in the Carolinas, loading cars with ballast to test braking mechanisms associated with the system.

Amtrak has been implementing the technology since 2000, and it is already in place throughout the Northeast Corridor and operating in many sections, including in parts of Maryland, according to Craig Schulz, of the national passenger railroad. Amtrak expects to have the technology working throughout the corridor by the 2015 deadline, he said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • UK government’s autumn statement – fuel tax freeze ‘a positive step’
    December 6, 2013
    Among the transport announcements made by the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, in his Autumn Statement, he promised tax relief for motorists, including a freeze in fuel duty for the remainder of this Parliament. He also confirmed the abolition of the paper road tax disc, ‘removing an administrative inconvenience for millions of motorists’ from October 2014. This move is expected to save the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) around US$5 million a year. It will also save fleet own
  • TRL makes SCOOT software openly available
    March 20, 2018
    TRL Software is seeking new outlets for the software behind the SCOOT (Split Cycle and Offset Optimisation Technique) adaptive traffic control system, after the original arrangement through which it supplied the software was dissolved.
  • Personal Rapid Transit, clear benefits for European cities
    July 26, 2012
    David Crawford watches the race to get the world's first PRT system up and running. To paraphrase the old joke about buses bunching, you seem to have to wait several decades for a Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) system, and then half a dozen come along together. Currently, in fact, there are well over that number of schemes for driverless electric passenger-carrying 'pod' networks at various stages of planning, design and implementation around the world. Locations range from a straight-off-the-drawing board ne
  • Trials show fuel savings with connected vehicle technology
    December 16, 2015
    American and European trials point to fuel and emissions reductions. A trial by University of California-Riverside (UC-Riverside) has shown connected vehicle technology has the potential to reduce fuel consumption (and therefore emissions) by up to 18% compared with an uninformed driver.