Skip to main content

Managed charging to solve EV demand issue, says TRL

Managed charging (MC) can shift electric vehicle (EV) charging demand in the UK away from peak times, according to a study led by TRL. MC aims to shift plug-in vehicle (PiV) charging load to times - such as overnight - when other demands are low. TRL found that, after experiencing some form of MC, the vast majority of people would be happy to switch to it. This research, part of TRL’s Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project, set out to investigate the challenges and opportunities involved in
September 10, 2019 Read time: 3 mins
Managed charging (MC) can shift electric vehicle (EV) charging demand in the UK away from peak times, according to a %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external study false https://trl.co.uk/sites/default/files/CVEI%20D5.3%20-%20Consumer%20Charging%20Trials%20Report.pdf false false%> led by 491 TRL.


MC aims to shift plug-in vehicle (PiV) charging load to times - such as overnight - when other demands are low.

TRL found that, after experiencing some form of MC, the vast majority of people would be happy to switch to it.

This research, part of TRL’s Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project, set out to investigate the challenges and opportunities involved in transitioning to a low carbon fleet.  

The project provided mainstream consumers (petrol or diesel vehicle owners) with eight weeks of experience of using and charging a battery electric vehicle (BEV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). These trials explored the consumers’ charging behaviour and response to approaches for the management of PiV charging demand.

Participants divided into the user-managed charging (UMC) charging group were incentivised to charge at times when electricity demand was low while those allocated to the supplier managed charging (SMC) group allowed the energy supplier to control the timing of the charge. Both groups were incentivised through a system where points earned from home charging could be converted to money at the end of the trial. A control group who did not experience MC were not incentivised to charge in a particular way but could earn these points by driving a minimum of 50 miles per week.

TRL’s report - Mainstream consumers' attitudes and behaviours under Managed Charging Schemes for BEVs and PHEVs – shows participants in the control group usually charged at home in the late afternoon/early evening (3pm-8pm). It reveals a peak in weekday charging between 5pm-6pm for PHEV participants and 6pm-7pm for BEV participants. At weekends, a greater share of charge events started earlier in the day. This shows that when charging is not managed, mainstream consumers are likely to charge in the early evening when other electricity demands are high.

Compared with unmanaged charging, the proportion of home charge events starting between 4pm-7pm was more than halved in the UMC and SMC groups. Most of the charging was shifted to later in the evening (UMC) or overnight (SMC).

Averaged across the groups, just under 90% of participants indicated that they would choose either UMC or SMC over unmanaged charging whether they had a PHEV or BEV.  

Dr Neale Kinnear, head of behavioural science at TRL, says: “We have generated an evidence base showing that managed charging is not only highly effective at shifting demand away from peak times, but it is also more appealing to the majority of mainstream consumers.”

Related Content

  • March 21, 2018
    Stella Vie solar car shows way forward
    The low-slung, curved roofline reminds you initially of a tortoise, but the latest solar-powered car from the Eindhoven University of Technology has a performance of which even the speediest tortoise can only dream. The ultra-streamlined Stella Vie car, built by students in 10 months from September 2016 for the World Solar Challenge, can get up to a highly-respectable 120km/h and travel up to 1000km on a sunny Dutch day. That comes from a lithium-ion battery that generates sufficient power for 600km, toppe
  • December 3, 2018
    Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • December 3, 2018
    Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • March 19, 2018
    Flir focuses on technologies to smooth traffic flows
    Flir Intelligent Transportation Systems is highlighting that the company is revolutionising how traffic flows on roadways throughout the world: innovative, field-proven solutions help keep vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles moving safely and smoothly. By combining video and thermal cameras with intelligent video analytics, radars, V2X communication technology with traffic management and data analytics software, Flir ITS has solutions, currently used all over the world, to keep all transport modes safe and