Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
December 3, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error.

In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians.

Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in modern vehicles.

This confusion remained after survey respondents were shown the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) levels – a set of standards designed to explain the requirements for increasing driver assistance and autonomy.

Only a third of respondents define a driverless car in accordance with SAE Level 5 - a vehicle which can make informed decisions and does not require a driver to take control in any situation.

One in 10 people think a fully-driverless car has one form of autonomous technology, such as steering, speed or braking control – but this is SAE Level 1.

A quarter of respondents are unaware of cruise control, while 75% of drivers do not believe they have ever used this form of technology.

Despite this, six out of 10 people think cruise control has already improved road safety, with respondents feeling the same way about lane assist (82%) and parking assist (71%). More than 80% of participants believe that autonomous emergency braking, a solution which the 1816 European Union is calling to be made standard in all new vehicles, will also improve road safety.

David Williams, Axa technical director, says he is not surprised by the confusion surrounding new technology: “What is clear is that we need to educate motorists on the benefits of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because consumer trust will be vital to their success.”

Last month, Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP, a European safety organisation, %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external revealed false http://news.thatcham.org/pressreleases/autonomous-driving-hype-is-dangerously-confusing-drivers-study-reveals-2767283 false false%> that 71% of UK drivers believe AVs are already on the market – and that nearly 20% think that a car marketed as being capable of automatic steering, braking and acceleration allows them to relax and let the car do the driving.

Related Content

  • September 13, 2019
    NACTO releases ‘blueprint’ for AVs in cities
    Autonomous vehicles (AVs) must be part of future transport policies which prioritise efficiency and fairness, according to senior transport executives in the US and Canada. The second edition of the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO)’s Blueprint for Autonomous Urbanism sets out what it calls “the concrete steps that will need to be taken to ensure an equitable, people-first city”. NACTO is a collection of 81 North American cities and transit agencies which exchange ideas and coo
    Read More
  • May 31, 2013
    Connected cones make for safer sites
    David Crawford welcomes new lives for old road safety products. Traffic cones and barrels have traditionally been on the bottom shelf of the road construction and maintenance industry, typically forming visible soft safety barriers for temporary works at a lower cost than concrete alternatives. On both sides of the Atlantic, however, they are fast gaining new roles as instrumented components in advanced construction safety arrays. The EC-sponsored €1 million (US$1.31 million) Safelane collaborative innovati
    Read More
  • February 14, 2019
    Ride-hailing and taxi drivers could face tougher criminal checks in England
    Drivers who ply their trade on apps such as Uber could be under greater scrutiny as part of proposals being put forward by the UK government. The potential risk to passengers from the explosion of ride-hailing apps, as private-hire drivers are perceived to receive less thorough vetting – for example, to flag up past convictions – has long been argued. Incidents such as the murders of passengers by a Didi driver in China heightened such concerns - although critics point out that a US Uber driver who ad
    Read More
  • April 17, 2019
    Lyft recalls 3,000 e-bikes across US
    Ride-hailing company Lyft has recalled 3,000 electric bikes from cities in the US because of concerns over their braking systems. The brands affected are Citi Bike in New York, Capital Bikeshare in Washington, DC, and the Bay Area’s Ford GoBike. A similar statement on each company’s website says: “We recently received a small number of reports from riders who experienced stronger than expected braking force on the front wheel. Out of an abundance of caution, we are proactively removing the pedal-assi
    Read More

Highlighted Content