Skip to main content

Major setback for California bullet train

The California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect the mega-regions of the state, contribute to economic development and a cleaner environment, create jobs and preserve agricultural and protected lands, was dealt a serious blow when Judge Michael Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that the California High-Speed Rail Authority "abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law."
August 27, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect the mega-regions of the state, contribute to economic development and a cleaner environment, create jobs and preserve agricultural and protected lands, was dealt a serious blow when Judge Michael Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that the California High-Speed Rail Authority "abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law."

The judge agreed with Kings County officials who argued that there should be a full environmental impact report (EIR) for the first stretch of the line before any work can begin. While the authority is close to completing the EIR on the whole segment, the judge's more damning ruling was about funding: The initiative "required the Authority to identify sources of funds that were more than merely theoretically possible, but instead were reasonably expected to be actually available when needed," Kenny said in his ruling. "The state's business plan identifies only potential funding, without commitments, agreements or authorisations,” he said.

Kenny is allowing work to start on the train, which is already seriously delayed, but he scheduled future hearings to decide how the violations can be addressed.
By 2029, the train is projected to run from San Francisco to the Los Angeles basin in under three hours at speeds capable of over 200 miles per hour. The system will eventually extend to Sacramento and San Diego, totalling 800 miles with up to twenty-four stations. In addition, the Authority is working with regional partners to implement a state-wide rail modernisation plan that will invest billions of dollars in local and regional rail lines to meet the state’s 21st century transportation needs.

Related Content

  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • Moovit brings MaaS to Illinois work programme
    December 3, 2020
    Connect2Work includes late-night service from Uber and Via on-demand microtransit
  • California to require all bus fleets to be zero-emission by 2040
    December 18, 2018
    The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has approved a statewide regulation which will require public transit agencies to gradually transition to fully zero emission buses by 2040. The Clean Transit regulation is expected to help transit agencies reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 19 million metric tonnes, nitrogen oxides by 7,000 tonnes and particulate matter by 40 tonnes from 2020 to 2050. CARB says the regulation will improve air quality, especially in low-income communities. It could also help
  • Report: wireless technologies leave vehicles exposed to hackers
    February 11, 2015
    New standards are needed to plug security and privacy gaps in cars and trucks, according to a report by US Senator Edward J. Markey. The report, Tracking & Hacking: Security & Privacy Gaps Put American Drivers at Risk and first reported on by CBS News’ 60 Minutes, reveals how sixteen major automobile manufacturers responded to questions from Markey in 2014 about how vehicles may be vulnerable to hackers, and how driver information is collected and protected. The responses from the automobile manufacturer