Skip to main content

Major setback for California bullet train

The California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect the mega-regions of the state, contribute to economic development and a cleaner environment, create jobs and preserve agricultural and protected lands, was dealt a serious blow when Judge Michael Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that the California High-Speed Rail Authority "abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law."
August 27, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The California High-Speed Rail project, which aims to connect the mega-regions of the state, contribute to economic development and a cleaner environment, create jobs and preserve agricultural and protected lands, was dealt a serious blow when Judge Michael Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court ruled that the California High-Speed Rail Authority "abused its discretion by approving a funding plan that did not comply with the requirements of the law."

The judge agreed with Kings County officials who argued that there should be a full environmental impact report (EIR) for the first stretch of the line before any work can begin. While the authority is close to completing the EIR on the whole segment, the judge's more damning ruling was about funding: The initiative "required the Authority to identify sources of funds that were more than merely theoretically possible, but instead were reasonably expected to be actually available when needed," Kenny said in his ruling. "The state's business plan identifies only potential funding, without commitments, agreements or authorisations,” he said.

Kenny is allowing work to start on the train, which is already seriously delayed, but he scheduled future hearings to decide how the violations can be addressed.
By 2029, the train is projected to run from San Francisco to the Los Angeles basin in under three hours at speeds capable of over 200 miles per hour. The system will eventually extend to Sacramento and San Diego, totalling 800 miles with up to twenty-four stations. In addition, the Authority is working with regional partners to implement a state-wide rail modernisation plan that will invest billions of dollars in local and regional rail lines to meet the state’s 21st century transportation needs.

Related Content

  • Mileage based charging offers secure future for funding
    August 10, 2016
    HNTB’s Matthew Click sets out why a move to mileage-based pricing is inevitable. Infrastructure is the most neglected yet the most critical engine of our society, and our continued indifference could lead to a dystopian future. Our roads, bridges and highways have been largely passed by in the digital age—marginalised in an era when funding is limited and stewardship of physical assets has given way to our preoccupation with technological innovation and data—the stuff of the virtual realm.
  • New transit centre for Rhode Island
    February 1, 2023
    Development will have space for bikes and is expected to serve three million users a year
  • Europe’s satellite projects ‘late and over budget’
    February 3, 2016
    The French court of Auditors has found that the European satellite navigation programmes, Galileo and EGNOS (the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service), the European satellite navigation programmes, will cost the EU more than US$14 billion over the period 1994-2020, says Euractiv. The delayed projects were originally allocated a budget of US$5 billion, according to the auditors. Galileo will cost a total of US$11 billion. Half of this amount had already been spent by the end of 2013. The C
  • Tispol announces support for new European cross border enforcement legislation
    November 8, 2013
    The European Traffic Police Network, Tispol, has come out in support of new European legislation, effective from 7 November 2013, requiring EU member states to exchange information on drivers who commit traffic offences in other countries. Tispol believes this information exchange will ensure that foreign offenders can be identified and punished across borders. It further improves the consistent enforcement of road safety rules throughout the EU by ensuring equal treatment of offenders. The legislation c