Skip to main content

Major automakers shift towards onboard chargers for electric vehicles

Most battery and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) manufacturers in Europe and the US have been adopting onboard chargers with a power output between 3 to 3.7 kilowatts (kW), according to new analysis from Frost & Sullivan. Now, EV manufacturers are moving towards onboard chargers with a power output greater than 6.6 kW to reduce charging time. While high-end PHEVs are contributing to this trend, lower-end models in this segment are still using 3.7 kW onboard chargers. Consequently, onboard chargers
May 6, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
Most battery and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) manufacturers in Europe and the US have been adopting onboard chargers with a power output between 3 to 3.7 kilowatts (kW), according to new analysis from 2097 Frost & Sullivan.

Now, EV manufacturers are moving towards onboard chargers with a power output greater than 6.6 kW to reduce charging time. While high-end PHEVs are contributing to this trend, lower-end models in this segment are still using 3.7 kW onboard chargers. Consequently, onboard chargers with power ratings between 3 to 3.7 kW are expected to remain dominant, accounting for 62 per cent of sales even in 2020.

The analysis, Strategic Analysis of the US and European Onboard Chargers Market, finds that sale volumes of onboard chargers stood at 304,683 units in 2014 and estimates this to reach 2,235,937 units in 2020.

More than 15 major companies supply onboard chargers globally, with Lear Corporation and 598 Panasonic in key positions as suppliers for 1960 Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf – the top-selling EVs in Europe and North America. All these companies offer isolated chargers and many, including Brusa and Panasonic, are investing in R&D to introduce non-isolated chargers.

"Currently, over 60 per cent of components required to make onboard chargers are being outsourced due to high in-house manufacturing costs," said Frost & Sullivan Automotive & Transportation senior research analyst Prajyot Sathe. "Tier I suppliers in Europe and the US have mainly been sourcing components such as electromagnetic interference filters, power factor controllers (PFCs), and direct current (DC)-DC converters from tier II suppliers."

While most suppliers have the expertise to manufacture components in-house, they have refrained from doing so due to low demand for onboard chargers. Suppliers must, however, begin to manufacture DC-DC converters and PFCs themselves, as these components account for the maximum cost of onboard chargers and contribute to higher prices.

"To cope with the current scenario, major vehicle original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as 2069 Daimler are expected to adopt the component sharing strategy, which will drive production volumes and reduce the cost of components," noted Sathe. "Another strategy vehicle OEMs could consider is entering strategic alliances to pool the technical expertise of partners and decrease manufacturing costs."

By way of high-volume manufacturing and strategic partnerships, onboard charger suppliers in Europe and the US will be able to lower the price of their products. While the current price of an onboard charger ranges from US$130 to us$230 per kW, prices are likely to fall by 20 to 25 per cent within 2020.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Phihong launches portable EV charger
    November 4, 2016
    US-based power solutions supplier Phihong has announced a new 10kW DC wheel-mounted electric vehicle charger for roadside assistance and remote area charging. The unit delivers 12V and 24V to power electric passenger cars and buses, and can function as energy storage systems providing 3.5kW backup AC power.
  • Report: Invest now in fuel cell vehicles?
    April 24, 2015
    According to IDTechEx, there is divided opinion on future of traction fuel cells in electric vehicles, though few argue any more that they will power the majority of electric vehicles (EVs). Nonetheless some manufacturers are very enthusiastic and now could be the beginning of the end of the trough of disillusionment, indeed the time to invest, as analysed in the IDTechEx report Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles 2015-2030: Land, Water, Air. A comparison of views by IDTechEx) found that Toyota, Nissan, Honda,
  • Ertico coordinates big data debate
    November 2, 2016
    David Crawford finds that agreeing a common data standard for auto manufacturers’ onboard sensors, navigation system companies and map makers is proving a complex task.
  • Webinar: Future of intelligent mobility and its impact on transportation
    June 1, 2015
    Frost & Sullivan’s webinar on 10 June 2015 at 1500 GMT will discuss the perspectives on intelligent mobility from various regions of the world; the potential to achieve carbon emission reduction, congestion alleviation and per-capita carbon footprint reduction; the roadmap to achieve intelligent mobility and the role of gamification; and comparative analysis of OEM strategies to achieve intelligent mobility, including a case study. Speakers are Frost & Sullivan program manager Automotive & Transportation