Skip to main content

LRC evaluates headlight systems to improve night driving

Through its Transportation Lighting and Safety program, the Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is evaluating the potential for new lighting technologies and approaches to improve driving safety at night, including new car headlight systems. For the study, vehicle manufacturer Audi AG has provided the LRC with an A7 equipped with adaptive high beam ‘matrix lights’ that allow drivers to benefit from using high beams all the time while selectively dimming a portion of the bea
June 26, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
Through its Transportation Lighting and Safety program, the Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is evaluating the potential for new lighting technologies and approaches to improve driving safety at night, including new car headlight systems.

For the study, vehicle manufacturer 2125 Audi AG has provided the LRC with an A7 equipped with adaptive high beam ‘matrix lights’ that allow drivers to benefit from using high beams all the time while selectively dimming a portion of the beam in the direction of other drivers to prevent glare. In the Audi system, the beam pattern is split into numerous individual light-emitting diodes (LEDs) arranged in a grid or matrix that adapts to the surroundings in real-time. The lighting system is being evaluated by LRC researchers this June.

The LRC earlier studied adaptive high beams as part of a project for the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that resulted in a report to Congress on nighttime glare and driving performance. Michael Perel, retired chief of the NHTSA Human Factors Division who initiated the project, said, “At that time, because of driver glare complaints and high nighttime crash rates, we wanted to investigate whether dynamically changing the forward light distribution in response to real-time road and traffic conditions could provide drivers with increased seeing distance without causing increased glare. The study did find potential benefits with this concept, variations of which are now being implemented by Audi and other manufacturers.”

LRC’s research for NHTSA demonstrated that forward visibility under adaptive high-beam systems was comparable to that under high beams, while disability and discomfort glare for oncoming drivers were comparable to levels experienced when facing low beams. The results of a recently published LRC study of driver visual performance suggest that nighttime crashes might be reduced up to seven per cent when adaptive high beams are used, relative to low-beam headlights.

Current requirements for vehicle forward lighting in the US specify the photometric performance of low- and high-beam headlight patterns, and vehicles are required to have a set of low-beam and a set of high-beam headlights conforming to these specifications. Adaptive high beams have not been used on vehicles in the US because the modifications to the high-beam beam pattern result in a pattern of illumination that does not conform with either the high- or the low-beam performance standards.

“Our expectation is that testing at Rensselaer of the Audi MatrixBeam system used in Europe will help ongoing standards development efforts in the US,” said Stephan Berlitz, head of Development, Lighting Functions and Innovations at Audi. “We believe the introduction of this technology in the US would be very well-received by customers, just as it has been in Europe and elsewhere, so we are happy to do all that we can to support standards and test procedure development for the US market.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
  • Asking drivers what information they need: radical but effective
    March 19, 2014
    When Texas A&M Transportation Institute was asked to devise a temporary traveller information system for work zones, it started by asking drivers what they need. Robert Brydia explains the thinking, implementation and results. US Interstate 35 (I-35) runs roughly north–south originating in Laredo, Texas and ends 1,500 miles away in Duluth, Minnesota having passed through Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri and Iowa. Within Texas the I-35 splits into I-35E and I-35W passing through Dallas and Fort Worth respectiv
  • UK organisations participate in EU green urban transport project
    April 1, 2014
    The UK’s Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), along with partners Transport and Travel Research (TTR) and several other leading UK organisations, are taking part in a 42-month innovative demonstration project which is investigating zero emission urban bus systems. The project, known as ZeEUS, is being co-ordinated by the International Association of Public Transport (UITP) and is co-funded by the DG Mobility and Transport of the European Commission with a budget of US$31 million (US$18.6 million EU fun
  • Transport Scotland opts for Vysionics average speed enforcement
    April 23, 2014
    Traffic control specialist Vysionics ITS has won a deal to deliver Europe’s longest average speed enforcement system. This will be installed on a 220km stretch of the A9 in Scotland. The installation will be the first time average speed cameras will have been used on such a long stretch of road on a permanent basis, rather than for short term use during road repairs. The current road configuration is a mixture of single and dual carriageway which carries a high proportion of HGV traffic. Part of the lon