Skip to main content

Lenient sentences for dangerous drivers in the UK criticised

The average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving in the UK is just four years – 62 per cent shorter than for manslaughter, according to road safety charity the IAM (Institute of Advanced Motorists). While the average sentence length of manslaughter is 6.6 years, those sentenced to prison for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving are given an average sentence of 1.3 years. Causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs has an average sentence of 4.3 years
July 13, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSThe average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving in the UK is just four years – 62 per cent shorter than for manslaughter, according to road safety charity the IAM (6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists). While the average sentence length of manslaughter is 6.6 years, those sentenced to prison for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving are given an average sentence of 1.3 years. Causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs has an average sentence of 4.3 years.

Fifty-three per cent of those convicted of causing death or bodily harm through driving offences were sentenced to immediate custody (260 people) in 2011/2. This has dropped from the 83 per cent who were sentenced to immediate custody in 2001.

Fines for drink driving are also lower in real terms than they were ten years ago, showing a 12.3 per cent decrease. Meanwhile, the average fine for careless driving is 27 per cent less in real terms than it was in 2001. Dangerous driving is the only area with tougher fines: the average fine is £518 (US$800), some 30 per cent more in real terms than in 2001.

As IAM chief executive Simon Best points out, the organisation recently discovered that the number of prosecutions for motoring offences has fallen from one million in 2010 to 888,000 in 2011, a drop of 12.6 per cent. “Now it is clear that drivers are also receiving short sentences for some of the most serious driving offences. Magistrates are handing out fines for drink driving that are less than five per cent of the maximum amount possible, giving the message that drink driving only warrants a slap on the wrist. Only sentences that reflect the seriousness of the crime will act as a proper deterrent,” Best said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Pedestrians still walking a tightrope in US
    August 23, 2024
    Although the Governors Highway Safety Association says annual US pedestrian traffic deaths fell for first time since Covid, they remain above pre-pandemic levels, finds David Arminas
  • 1 in 14 motorists admit to taking 'selfies' while driving
    March 20, 2014
    Research by price comparison website Confused.com shows that 1 in 14 motorists (seven per cent) admit to having taken a photograph while driving, and four per cent also use the social media app of the moment, Snapchat, to send photos to friends while at the wheel. In addition, 36 per cent of motorists admit to using their mobile phone when driving, mainly to make or answer calls (75 per cent) and send or check texts (43 per cent). Yet, despite so many flouting the law, only eight per cent say they have
  • Reducing injuries and deaths in US workzones shouldn’t be this complicated
    April 17, 2023
    In National Work Zone Awareness Week, surely the least we can do is to help get road workers home safely at the end of the day, says One.network's boss
  • Study in Finland shows infrastructure is a good investment
    March 28, 2012
    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, the University of Oulu and Aalto University in Finland have analysed the financial statements for 2002-2009 of companies, public utilities, and municipal units that own infrastructure, including water services, as well as road, port, airport, railway and electricity networks. Owning infrastructure is relatively risk-free. The most profitable is the energy sector where the return on investment was about 13%. The average annual return on investment of ports was 10%. T