Skip to main content

Lenient sentences for dangerous drivers in the UK criticised

The average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving in the UK is just four years – 62 per cent shorter than for manslaughter, according to road safety charity the IAM (Institute of Advanced Motorists). While the average sentence length of manslaughter is 6.6 years, those sentenced to prison for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving are given an average sentence of 1.3 years. Causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs has an average sentence of 4.3 years
July 13, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSThe average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving in the UK is just four years – 62 per cent shorter than for manslaughter, according to road safety charity the IAM (6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists). While the average sentence length of manslaughter is 6.6 years, those sentenced to prison for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving are given an average sentence of 1.3 years. Causing death by careless driving when under the influence of drink or drugs has an average sentence of 4.3 years.

Fifty-three per cent of those convicted of causing death or bodily harm through driving offences were sentenced to immediate custody (260 people) in 2011/2. This has dropped from the 83 per cent who were sentenced to immediate custody in 2001.

Fines for drink driving are also lower in real terms than they were ten years ago, showing a 12.3 per cent decrease. Meanwhile, the average fine for careless driving is 27 per cent less in real terms than it was in 2001. Dangerous driving is the only area with tougher fines: the average fine is £518 (US$800), some 30 per cent more in real terms than in 2001.

As IAM chief executive Simon Best points out, the organisation recently discovered that the number of prosecutions for motoring offences has fallen from one million in 2010 to 888,000 in 2011, a drop of 12.6 per cent. “Now it is clear that drivers are also receiving short sentences for some of the most serious driving offences. Magistrates are handing out fines for drink driving that are less than five per cent of the maximum amount possible, giving the message that drink driving only warrants a slap on the wrist. Only sentences that reflect the seriousness of the crime will act as a proper deterrent,” Best said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Surge in crime rate and terrorist activities in Europe ‘driving use of policing technologies’
    August 19, 2016
    The Europe policing technologies market is expected to register a 6.0 per cent CAGR from 2016 to 2024, with the revenue set to increase from US$1.4 billion in 2015 to US$2.4 billion by the end of the forecast period, according to a new Transparency Market Research (TMR) report, Policing Technologies Market - Europe Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2016 - 2024. Accounting for a share of 36 per cent in 2015, detection and surveillance technologies emerged as the leading policing
  • PoliScanspeed camera nabs two serious speeders in Australia
    May 1, 2012
    Two reckless speedsters were caught having a road a race in Western Australia by a Vitronic PoliScanspeed camera, the company reports. The speed measuring system revealed they were 105 kph (65 mph) and 117 kph (73 mph) above the official speed limit. The two were sentenced to high fines and long-term suspension of their driver licenses.
  • Signal optimisation reduces congestion, improves travel times
    February 2, 2012
    The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County's Department of Public Works(MPW) identified seven corridors in the County that experience heavy traffic congestion and needed traffic signal timing improvements to improve traffic flow as well as air quality and fuel consumption. The seven corridors included a total of 223 signalised intersections. To conduct this study, termed the Traffic Signal Optimisation Study for the Metro Nashville Signal System, MPW received funding from the Federal Conge
  • Call for Juncker to reverse decision to drop serious road injury target
    June 10, 2015
    More than 40 European organisations concerned with road safety, together with 11 members of the European Parliament have sent a letter to President Jean-Claude Juncker urging him to not drop setting new EU target to cut serious road injuries. The letter was sent yesterday by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC), ahead of Thursday's meeting of national transport ministers in Luxembourg where the target was set to be announced. The European Transport Safety Council has learnt that the announcemen