Skip to main content

Legal streetfight brews as Trump 'saves' New York from congestion charge

MTA lawyers challenge USDoT move to shut down Manhattan toll scheme
By Adam Hill February 20, 2025 Read time: 3 mins
Enforcement cameras are staying on, insists MTA (© Juliengrondin | Dreamstime.com)

Not even two months after it was introduced, New York City's congestion charge scheme is under threat of being shut down by the US government.

A letter signed by transportation secretary Sean Duffy says the US Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has terminated approval of the central business district tolling programme (CBDTP) pilot.

The FHWA "will work with the project sponsors on an orderly termination of the tolls". 

US president Donald Trump was even more emphatic, posting on his Truth Social platform: "CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!"

However, New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has issued a legal challenge against the decision, and the agency's chair and CEO Janno Lieber was defiant: "We’re not turning off the tolls until there’s a verdict."

Drivers are currently charged $9 per day to enter Lower Manhattan - Duffy called this "a slap in the face to working class Americans and small business owners".

He said that commuters using roads to enter the city "have already financed the construction and improvement of these highways through the payment of gas taxes and other taxes". 

He adds: "But now the toll programme leaves drivers without any free highway alternative, and instead, takes more money from working people to pay for a transit system and not highways. It’s backwards and unfair."

It also hurts small businesses in New York that rely on customers from New Jersey and Connecticut, Duffy insists: "Finally, it impedes the flow of commerce into New York by increasing costs for trucks, which in turn could make goods more expensive for consumer. Every American should be able to access New York City regardless of their economic means. It shouldn’t be reserved for an elite few.”

Duffy cites two reasons for the decision. Firstly, "the scope of the CBDTP is unprecedented and provides no toll-free option for many drivers who want or need to travel by vehicle in this major urbanised area". 

Secondly, the toll was set primarily to fund the city's transit network, "rather than at an amount needed to reduce congestion". This, Duffy says, runs contrary to the Value Pricing Pilot Program (VPPP) under which it was agreed, "which is to impose tolls for congestion reduction – not transit revenue generation".

 

'Roadkill on Donald Trump's revenge tour against New York'

MTA has filed legal papers in the US federal court to prevent the shut down of the "highly successful programme" which has "dramatically reduced congestion", and increased speeds for buses and emergency vehicles.

"It’s mystifying that after four years and 4,000 pages of federally-supervised environmental review – and barely three months after giving final approval to the Congestion Relief Program – USDoT would seek to totally reverse course," says MTA chair and CEO Janno Lieber.

Although New York governor Kathy Hochul scuttled congestion pricing herself in a surprise move last year before the scheme was finally reinstated, she was scathing about the Trump Administration letter.

"The commuters of our city and our region are now the roadkill on Donald Trump's revenge tour against New York", she said.

There are "a lot of legal reasons why we know we're going to be victorious", Hochul added. 

She insisted the MTA had been prepared for potential legal action. 

"We knew this could come and filed a lawsuit within minutes. I'm very confident we will be successful. And I also want to say, the cameras are staying on. We are keeping the cameras on. Lights, cameras, action. They're staying on."

Lieber made the case for improvements made since congestion pricing was introduced at the beginning of January in terms of traffic reduction (down 9%), safer cross-streets and faster bus journeys.

He concludes: "New York ain't going back. We tried gridlock for 60 years. It didn't work. It cost our economy billions. But you know what's helping our economy? What's making New York a better place? Congestion pricing."

Related Content

  • VW faces first legal test case over emissions in Germany
    January 6, 2017
    German consumer rights champion myRight filed the first legal test case against Volkswagen (VW) in Germany on Tuesday, raising pressure on the carmaker to compensate customers in Europe over the emissions scandal, according to Reuters. VW has pledged billions to compensate US owners of its diesel-powered cars, but has so far rejected any compensation for the 8.5 million affected vehicles in Europe where different legal rules weaken the chances of affected customers winning a pay-out. Instead, VW is in
  • UK lane rental schemes set to go nationwide to help reduce congestion
    February 20, 2018
    UK lane rental schemes, where utility companies can be charged up to £2,500 ($3,499) each day for digging up the busiest roads at peak times, can be adopted by councils as part of a government approved strategy to help reduce congestion. The announcement follows successful trials conducted in London and Kent. This scheme aims to incentivise firms to work on quieter roads or outside of rush hour as well as collaborate with other companies to prevent roads from being dug up multiple times. Around 2.5 mi
  • Birmingham CAZ is green for go
    July 26, 2021
    For urban authorities worldwide, the health of residents is racing up the political agenda. Ben Spencer looks at how one city - Birmingham, UK - has established its own Clean Air Zone and is investing in alternative-fuel vehicles and public transport incentives
  • Road user charging comes a step closer in Oregon
    December 19, 2017
    Having been the first US state to introduce the gas tax a century ago, Oregon is now blazing the road user charging trail. Colin Sowman looks at progress to date. For more than a decade, authorities in Oregon have known of the impending decline in fuels tax income and while revenue increased by more than 5% in 2016, that growth will slow considerably this year and income is projected to start declining in 2020.