Skip to main content

ITS (UK): Shift to emissions free vehicles will make road network funding unsustainable

Shortfalls in fuel tax caused by moving to emissions-free vehicles will make current ways of funding road networks unsustainable, according to a joint forum between ITS (UK) Road User Charging Interest Group and ITS Ireland hosted by Aecom, Dublin. The group consisted of policy makers, toll operators, payment providers and highway users from seven European countries.
November 30, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Shortfalls in fuel tax caused by moving to emissions-free vehicles will make current ways of funding road networks unsustainable, according to a joint forum between ITS (UK) Road User Charging Interest Group and 7075 ITS Ireland hosted by 3525 Aecom, Dublin. The group consisted of policy makers, toll operators, payment providers and highway users from seven European countries.


The forum discussed how declining revenues must be bridged by fair and equitable measures to fund increased demands for mobility and that different taxation models are required for the public to buy into needed change. In addition, plans need to be simply expressed and clearly communicated while tackling the complexities of gaps in infrastructure funding, toxic emissions and climate change.

Speakers pointed to a recent study by the UK National Infrastructure Commission which claimed that distance based charging and congestion measures would bring more reliable journeys and improve national productivity.

Public-private co-operation was also addressed by the group who highlighted a need to share information so that disruptive market developments can be integrated alongside legacy schemes to deliver timely mobility improvements while countering the risk of unintended negative consequences.

Keith Mortimer, chair of the Road User Charging Group said, “Environmental objectives make emissions-free driving essential, but the demand for mobility will only increase. The transition to road pricing is under way, offering positive outcomes that respect the legitimate aspirations of all stakeholders. Effective governance will capitalise on innovation to enhance economic performance and social well-being.”

Jennie Martin, ITS (UK) secretary general, added: “Working together, our specialists have identified key challenges facing transport and offered solutions and advice to help policy makers justify the necessary changes. Once again our collective expertise has helped tackle a difficult issue giving leadership to the industry.”

Related Content

  • March 15, 2019
    Asfinag makes case for ITS-G5 over 5G
    Asfinag’s Manfred Harrer and Peter Meckel talk to Jason Barnes about the organisation’s first steps towards C-ITS deployments - and why ITS-G5 will be the underpinning standard For quite a number of years, it was assumed that the connectivity required for cooperative ITS (C-ITS) applications and autonomous vehicle (AV) operations would be catered for by a bespoke communications solution/protocol. This would provide localised ad hoc communication in a manner similar to Wi-Fi, and the dedicated bandwidth/n
  • August 8, 2017
    Considering accessibility costs little and pays dividends for all travellers
    Catering for those with disabilities can be cost-effective and improve services for all travellers, as David Crawford discovers. Clearer understanding of the economic value of accessible transport is essential if we are to speed up the current slow deployment levels, according to the Paris-based International Transport Forum (ITF), which staged a 2016 round table on the ‘Benefits and Costs of Inclusion in Transport’. It wants to see greater availability of data on levels of actual and unmet demand for acces
  • June 27, 2023
    Georgia Yexley: Here's how micromobility can deliver public good
    Georgia Yexley, founder of Loud Mobility, looks at the lessons on diversity, equity and inclusion which can be learned from the US and wider – and explores why it is a vital component for industry growth in the UK
  • February 1, 2012
    Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is