Skip to main content

ITS (UK) Interest Group calls for targeted initiatives on transport emissions

A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.
November 21, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.


The meeting, hosted by 6110 Amey in Birmingham, covered a variety of subjects including Scotland’s low Emissions Zones, 8101 Highways England’s Air Quality Strategy and what is being done in the West Midlands and Greater Manchester.

One presentation on shared data suggested that regulating speeds has a smaller effect on air quality than previously thought. As a result, some attempts to smooth traffic flows on main roads has led to a greater traffic build-up on side roads leading to harmful emissions where people live.

Attendees heard that part of the ITS Industry’s role should be to use collected data to help change people’s attitudes and understanding about why things need to change and the industry must work more collaboratively; a change which needs to be government-led  

Interest Group chair, professor Margaret Bell of Newcastle University, said: “Understanding the scale of the problem we are facing is very important. Given that we have the target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 67% by 2050 over 2010 levels, business as usual is not an option. That is non-negotiable. We know that we can help reduce emissions but the key thing we must do is reduce the vehicle kilometres travelled.

“The win-win for carbon and air quality is going to be really tough to deliver and I see that where ITS should be going in the future is in the demand management, actually reducing the traffic on the road and the data we are collecting needs to educate people as to why we should be doing this.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Asecap prepares for ‘interoperability on steroids’
    March 31, 2023
    The gathering of Europe’s toll professionals offers a chance for views to be exchanged by senior people on a number of big issues: and there’s currently an awful lot to think about, reports Geoff Hadwick
  • Mott Macdonald appoints Glenn Lyons as chair of future mobility
    January 10, 2018
    Mott Macdonald (MM) has appointed professor Glenn Lyons as chair of its future mobility initiative to help develop its transport expertise in understanding and responding to a changing and uncertain mobility landscape, shaped by technological possibilities and societal needs. MM will also sponsor his position at the University of the West of England Bristol. Lyons has been professor of transport and society at the University since 2002 and was founding director of its Centre for Transport and Society. His
  • Asecap Days 2023: Data drives the best decisions
    December 22, 2023
    Almost all the data being collected by highway operators is going to waste. But if firms collect and analyse these ‘vast lakes of data’ they can investigate threats, monitor management systems and drive up revenues, delegates were told at Asecap Days 2023. Geoff Hadwick reports
  • Carrots are proving cost-effective in Netherlands
    October 3, 2018
    There are lessons to be learned from congestion avoidance schemes in the Netherlands. David Crawford welcomes some new thinking in road pricing. Highway operators worldwide are being urged to learn from Dutch experience in using financial carrots rather than sticks to encourage drivers to avoid contributing to congestion. A Netherlands/UK group makes a convincing cost/benefit case in a new global survey of road pricing technologies, economics and acceptability. Representing the Rijkswaterstaat section of