Skip to main content

ITS (UK) Interest Group calls for targeted initiatives on transport emissions

A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.
November 21, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.


The meeting, hosted by 6110 Amey in Birmingham, covered a variety of subjects including Scotland’s low Emissions Zones, 8101 Highways England’s Air Quality Strategy and what is being done in the West Midlands and Greater Manchester.

One presentation on shared data suggested that regulating speeds has a smaller effect on air quality than previously thought. As a result, some attempts to smooth traffic flows on main roads has led to a greater traffic build-up on side roads leading to harmful emissions where people live.

Attendees heard that part of the ITS Industry’s role should be to use collected data to help change people’s attitudes and understanding about why things need to change and the industry must work more collaboratively; a change which needs to be government-led  

Interest Group chair, professor Margaret Bell of Newcastle University, said: “Understanding the scale of the problem we are facing is very important. Given that we have the target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 67% by 2050 over 2010 levels, business as usual is not an option. That is non-negotiable. We know that we can help reduce emissions but the key thing we must do is reduce the vehicle kilometres travelled.

“The win-win for carbon and air quality is going to be really tough to deliver and I see that where ITS should be going in the future is in the demand management, actually reducing the traffic on the road and the data we are collecting needs to educate people as to why we should be doing this.”

Related Content

  • July 22, 2016
    EU sets emissions targets to 2030, richer countries bear the burden
    The UK’s Freight Transport Association (FTA) and FIA Europe have welcomed the European Commission’s package of measures, presented this week, to accelerate the transition to low carbon emissions in all sectors of the economy in Europe. The EU says the measures set clear and fair guiding principles to Member States to prepare for the future and keep Europe competitive. Responding to the announcement, the FTA said that the proposed measures are a step in the right direction to reducing freight carbon e
  • January 12, 2018
    UK Cyclists, pedestrians and equestrians need roads with them in mind
    Cyclists, pedestrians and equestrians would prefer improvements on Highways England's (HE's) road network to be open to all types of user – but safely, with areas of greater risk identified and appropriate interventions made, according to a new report from Transport Focus (TF). The independent watchdog engaged with these road users across the UK who stressed the importance of the network in affecting their everyday lives. Key findings showed that safety is of crucial importance to all three groups when
  • October 7, 2021
    Lessons learned after year of Spin
    Micromobility firm's discussion highlights some challenges of e-scooter deployment in UK
  • June 14, 2018
    Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s