Skip to main content

ITS (UK) Interest Group calls for targeted initiatives on transport emissions

A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.
November 21, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
A more targeted approach to dealing with the automotive industry which has the biggest effect on transport emissions is needed; rather than an overall reduction in average levels of harmful pollutants, according to a meeting held by the ITS (UK) Smart Environment Interest Group. The event featured experts using Intelligent transport systems (ITS) to help improve the environment.


The meeting, hosted by 6110 Amey in Birmingham, covered a variety of subjects including Scotland’s low Emissions Zones, 8101 Highways England’s Air Quality Strategy and what is being done in the West Midlands and Greater Manchester.

One presentation on shared data suggested that regulating speeds has a smaller effect on air quality than previously thought. As a result, some attempts to smooth traffic flows on main roads has led to a greater traffic build-up on side roads leading to harmful emissions where people live.

Attendees heard that part of the ITS Industry’s role should be to use collected data to help change people’s attitudes and understanding about why things need to change and the industry must work more collaboratively; a change which needs to be government-led  

Interest Group chair, professor Margaret Bell of Newcastle University, said: “Understanding the scale of the problem we are facing is very important. Given that we have the target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 67% by 2050 over 2010 levels, business as usual is not an option. That is non-negotiable. We know that we can help reduce emissions but the key thing we must do is reduce the vehicle kilometres travelled.

“The win-win for carbon and air quality is going to be really tough to deliver and I see that where ITS should be going in the future is in the demand management, actually reducing the traffic on the road and the data we are collecting needs to educate people as to why we should be doing this.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cloud computing technology benefits GIS
    July 17, 2012
    Geographic Information Systems are a relatively late adopter of cloud computing,but the benefits of host services for geospatial data and analysis are becoming clear. Jason Barnes reports Both the concept and the reality of cloud computing have been around for some time. More and more industry sectors are entrusting external service providers with the provision of their computing services via the internet. However, the Geographic Information System (GIS) industry has been slow to embrace the trend. This is
  • Smoothing the path to reducing traffic pollution
    October 22, 2014
    David Crawford reviews a new approach to traffic smoothing. A key objective for the Californian city of Bakersfield’s upgraded traffic operations centre (TOC), which opened in June 2014, is to help improve living conditions in a region with one of the worst air quality problems in the US. The TOC is speeding up the smoothing of traffic flows by delivering faster and better-informed traffic signal retiming and synchronisation.
  • Need for standardisation of toll classes
    March 2, 2012
    In a previous article Bob Lees of Idris Technology Ltd looked at the appropriateness of toll classes in relation to all-electronic toll fee collection. Here, he looks at how addressing classification standardisation could avoid downstream aggravation and cost
  • ITS benefits need to be better explained to the public
    May 1, 2018
    Nine out of ten of ITS (UK) members believe that more needs to be done to explain the benefits of ITS to the public. Respondents to a survey said that raising awareness would help sell the case to decision makers to fund technology rather than infrastructure solutions. However, participants were divided in their views on the understanding of, and support for, ITS from national and local government: 56% agreed or strongly agreed that government is supporting transport technology transport technology, while