Skip to main content

ITS Australia: used vehicle imports ‘a risk to safety’

Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Australia has highlighted the risks to Australian transport safety that would be created by allowing parallel new vehicle and used vehicle imports. The warning is part of ITS Australia’s submission to the Federal Government 2014 Review of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989. Infrastructure and Regional Development Minister Jamie Briggs’ terms of reference for the 2014 Review emphasises “ . . . reducing regulatory burden (red tape) on business . . .” and whether the Ac
October 31, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Australia has highlighted the risks to Australian transport safety that would be created by allowing parallel new vehicle and used vehicle imports. The warning is part of 858 ITS Australia’s submission to the Federal Government 2014 Review of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989.

Infrastructure and Regional Development Minister Jamie Briggs’ terms of reference for the 2014 Review emphasises “ . . . reducing regulatory burden (red tape) on business . . .” and whether the Act “. . . facilitates effective and proportionate compliance by industry and consumers bringing new and used road vehicles to the Australian market for the first time.”

ITS Australia chief executive officer Susan Harris said reducing barriers to used and parallel imported vehicles could have significant unintended consequences for the safety and efficiency of Australian transport.

“Advanced technologies, such as Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS), make vehicles safer. C-ITS is one of the few technologies effective at preventing dangerous vehicle to vehicle side impact crashes,” she said.

“C-ITS wireless communication technology enables vehicles and surrounding infrastructure to exchange information about precise location, speed and direction. These systems are the next major step forward in reducing road trauma.  

“Used and parallel import vehicles brought into Australia will have C-ITS equipment that meets specifications for a different region, not Australia. The C-ITS in such vehicles will not work in Australia. Drivers and purchasers of these vehicles may be unaware that they are missing out on this life saving technology.  

“The safety benefit of this technology is intrinsically linked to the ability for two or more vehicles to exchange information wirelessly. The more vehicles that are fitted with this technology – the safer our roads will be.

“Any reduced take-up of C-ITS vehicles would be in direct conflict with the Federal Government’s stated road safety agenda. Reducing barriers to used and parallel imported vehicles puts this safety agenda for Australia at risk,” said Harris.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Global ADAS market is expected to reach US$60.14 billion by 2020
    May 13, 2015
    A new report from Allied Market Research, Global Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Market Size, Industry Analysis, Trends, Opportunities, Growth and Forecast, 2013 – 2020 claims the global advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) market will reach US$60.14 billion by 2020, registering a CAGR of 22.8 per cent during 2014-2020. According to the report, the deployment of sensors in vehicles has brought a massive transformation in the automotive industry by providing improved passenger experience and safet
  • Dynamic Message Signs : Don’t replace, refurbish and upgrade
    August 12, 2015
    Refurbishing old dynamic message signs can save money and increase technical capabilities as David Crawford discovers. Evidence is growing on both sides of the Atlantic of the scope for retrofitting old or technically out-of-date dynamic message signs (DMS) with new electronic equipment, to save on the costs of installing full-scale replacements. In the last four months of 2014, a number of US states progressed programmes that achieved savings of more than US$1.75 million (€1.56million).
  • Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    February 2, 2012
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.
  • Don’t drive drunk – or use a hands-free phone
    August 29, 2019
    Despite law changes, drivers’ bad habits have been creeping back in. TRL’s Dr Shaun Helman tells Adam Hill why using a phone at the wheel is just as distracting as driving after a few drinks esearch from as far back as 2002 (see box) suggests that driving while making a phone call – either hands-free or holding a handset to your ear – creates the same amount of distraction as being drunk behind the wheel. While it is notoriously hard to predict how alcohol will affect an individual (due to the speed of