Skip to main content

ITS Australia: used vehicle imports ‘a risk to safety’

Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Australia has highlighted the risks to Australian transport safety that would be created by allowing parallel new vehicle and used vehicle imports. The warning is part of ITS Australia’s submission to the Federal Government 2014 Review of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989. Infrastructure and Regional Development Minister Jamie Briggs’ terms of reference for the 2014 Review emphasises “ . . . reducing regulatory burden (red tape) on business . . .” and whether the Ac
October 31, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) Australia has highlighted the risks to Australian transport safety that would be created by allowing parallel new vehicle and used vehicle imports. The warning is part of 858 ITS Australia’s submission to the Federal Government 2014 Review of the Motor Vehicle Standards Act 1989.

Infrastructure and Regional Development Minister Jamie Briggs’ terms of reference for the 2014 Review emphasises “ . . . reducing regulatory burden (red tape) on business . . .” and whether the Act “. . . facilitates effective and proportionate compliance by industry and consumers bringing new and used road vehicles to the Australian market for the first time.”

ITS Australia chief executive officer Susan Harris said reducing barriers to used and parallel imported vehicles could have significant unintended consequences for the safety and efficiency of Australian transport.

“Advanced technologies, such as Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS), make vehicles safer. C-ITS is one of the few technologies effective at preventing dangerous vehicle to vehicle side impact crashes,” she said.

“C-ITS wireless communication technology enables vehicles and surrounding infrastructure to exchange information about precise location, speed and direction. These systems are the next major step forward in reducing road trauma.  

“Used and parallel import vehicles brought into Australia will have C-ITS equipment that meets specifications for a different region, not Australia. The C-ITS in such vehicles will not work in Australia. Drivers and purchasers of these vehicles may be unaware that they are missing out on this life saving technology.  

“The safety benefit of this technology is intrinsically linked to the ability for two or more vehicles to exchange information wirelessly. The more vehicles that are fitted with this technology – the safer our roads will be.

“Any reduced take-up of C-ITS vehicles would be in direct conflict with the Federal Government’s stated road safety agenda. Reducing barriers to used and parallel imported vehicles puts this safety agenda for Australia at risk,” said Harris.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Support for US transportation bill
    November 6, 2015
    The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America) and the Teamsters have given their support to the Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 (the STRR Act), which was overwhelmingly approved by the US House of Representatives after three days of debate. The bipartisan, multi-year surface transportation bill to reauthorise and reform federal highway, transit, and highway safety programs helps improve US surface transportation infrastructure, refocuses programs on address
  • The future? It's remote, says Valerann
    January 4, 2024
    More responsive traffic management is of enormous value – and Valerann thinks its SaaS system, remotely deployed in Latin America, is able to identify incidents much more quickly, finds Andrew Stone
  • ATA coalition asks congress to reject devolution of highway program
    March 18, 2015
    In a letter to Congress, the American Trucking Association (ATA) and a coalition of 37 other organisations has warned about the dangers of devolving the federal highway program and urged passage of a robust, long-term highway bill that secures the federal role in transportation. In the letter, ATA and its allies told Congress they strongly oppose devolution proposals such as the Transportation Empowerment Act (TEA), previously introduced and considered in the 113th Congress. They say TEA is an ill-conceive
  • Safety measures can cut road deaths – and here’s the proof
    May 14, 2024
    Johns Hopkins report using iRAP methodology shows 700,000 fatalities prevented