Skip to main content

ITE: position statement on C/AVs following fatal crash in Arizona

A strong government role remains critical to ensuring that the deployment of connected and automated vehicles (C/AVs) improves the quality of lives for all citizens – according to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Washington DC-based company’s new position statement has been published following the fatal crash involving a self-driving car in Arizona and the rapid development of the technology. ITE highlighted that governments must provide the regulatory oversight to ensure that C/AV test
April 4, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

A strong government role remains critical to ensuring that the deployment of connected and automated vehicles (C/AVs) improves the quality of lives for all citizens – according to the 5667 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The Washington DC-based company’s new position statement has been published following the fatal crash involving a self-driving car in Arizona and the rapid development of the technology.

ITE highlighted that governments must provide the regulatory oversight to ensure that C/AV testing is done transparently and that public safety is not compromised. They can also play a key role in working with the private sector to facilitate deployment and remove regulatory barriers to widespread deployment of proven technologies. The institute highlighted that the private sector, working with the government, has the responsibility to verify that new technologies have been fully tested in off-the-road environments before they enter public roads.

ITE is recommending six key tenants for the development of these vehicles. It includes a Vision Zero goal which reflects the institute's opinion that eliminating fatalities and serious injuries is only possible through C/AVs. Secondly, new technologies must be evaluated in real-world conditions after being tested in off-the-road environments. In addition, ITE supports the rapid adoption of safety assist (SAE Level one) technologies such as lane keeping, blind spot warning, autonomous cruise control and automatic braking on all new vehicles. However, the fourth tenant underscores the institutes belief that SAE Level two and three systems requiring driver monitoring have not been proven safe for use on the open road, in all environments.  The next recommendation states that SAE Level four systems are the most appropriate as an objective for driverless vehicles. Tennant six estimates that cooperative systems achieved through communication between vehicles, infrastructure and other users will provide an enhanced layer of safety and must be pursued.  

More information on the tenants is available %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external here ITE website link false http://library.ite.org/pub/6059bdbd-aaef-45e4-58f6-f14962022873 false false%>.

Related Content

  • November 6, 2019
    NTSB: Uber’s AV in fatal crash ‘had software issues’
    The US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has found that an Uber autonomous vehicle which killed Elaine Herzberg last year had software flaws. NTSB released a report which says the Volvo XC60’s autonomous system software classified the pedestrian as an unknown object and determined that an emergency braking manoeuvre was needed to mitigate the collision. Uber confirmed that emergency braking manoeuvres must be carried out manually and the system is not designed to alert the driver. Data
  • November 6, 2018
    Uber seeks to resume AV trials nearly eight months after Arizona fatality
    Uber wants to resume testing its self-driving cars on public roads nearly eight months after one of its autonomous vehicles (AV) killed a pedestrian in Arizona. The ride-hailing company has released a voluntary safety report to the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration which includes safety enhancements to help prevent crashes and fatalities. Uber says its AVs would include two mission specialists – employees who have completed advanced training courses in self-driving vehicle operations. The
  • December 3, 2018
    Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • December 3, 2018
    Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo