Skip to main content

ICE State of the Nation report ‘makes grim reading’ says expert

The UK’s Institution of Civil Engineers has issued its 2014 State of the Nation: Infrastructure report, which focuses on the performance, capacity and condition of the UK's key economic infrastructure networks. The report finds that the UK approach to delivering and maintaining infrastructure requires attention and recommends that progress made to date should be built upon to ensure that the UK possesses world class infrastructure. It also finds that three sectors – energy, flood management and local tra
June 27, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The UK’s Institution of Civil Engineers has issued its 2014 State of the Nation: Infrastructure report, which focuses on the performance, capacity and condition of the UK's key economic infrastructure networks.

The report finds that the UK approach to delivering and maintaining infrastructure requires attention and recommends that progress made to date should be built upon to ensure that the UK possesses world class infrastructure. It also finds that three sectors – energy, flood management and local transport – are of particular concern, while water, waste and strategic transport require ‘future proofing’. The report also addresses cross-cutting issues such as decarbonisation, infrastructure design standards, availability of infrastructure services and impacts of changing weather patterns and population growth.

Responding to the report, Richard Threlfall, KPMG UK head of Infrastructure, Building and Construction, says: “The report makes grim reading, forcing us all to confront the reality of the infrastructure deficit in our energy, flood defence and local transport systems.

“It is a challenge to all our political parties either to grasp the nettle now and invest for a 21st century society, or explain to voters why the standard of living we enjoy today may not be as good for our children.

“It represents a strong endorsement for Sir John' Armitt's proposed Infrastructure Commission, in its calls for an integrated national transport strategy, and prioritisation criteria between infrastructure schemes in the National Infrastructure Plan.

“The report also bravely provokes the idea that in future perhaps the UK cannot expect 100 per cent infrastructure availability. Are we a nation that will accept electricity rationing, or regular closure of rail and road networks in the event of flooding?”

Related Content

  • July 11, 2013
    New vision for London’s 21st century roads and streets
    London’s Mayor’s Roads Task Force (RTF) has set out a bold new vision for the future of the city’s roads and streets to ensure the capital can cope with major population growth, support jobs and thousands of new homes, while remaining one of the most attractive, vibrant, accessible and competitive world cities. A range of proposals includes: roofing over arterial roads to create new surface space; changing the way goods and services are delivered, such as shifting HGVs and freight out of peak hours; embraci
  • November 24, 2016
    UK government to invest in autonomous cars, low emission vehicles
    Presenting his Autumn Statement, Chancellor Philip Hammond announced investment in transportation, including £390 million for future transport and a major new investment in the UK transport infrastructure. The £390 million investment in future technology includes: investment in testing infrastructure for driverless cars; provision of at least 550 new electric and hydrogen buses, reduce the emissions of 1,500 existing buses and support taxis to become zero emission; installation of more charging points fo
  • February 2, 2012
    Economic crisis needs non-partisan perspectives to stimulate growth
    Kary Witt, President of the IBTTA and Pat Jones, Executive Director and CEO, talk about the need to put aside partisan perspectives in order to deal with the current economic crisis
  • May 30, 2013
    A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe