Skip to main content

House proposes US$10.5 billion eight-month highway bill

The US Government House Ways and Means Committee is proposing a US$10.5 billion, eight-month transportation funding bill to push the debate over road and transit spending into the next Congress. The proposal, which calls for a temporary extension of current transportation funding levels until 31 May 2015, comes as lawmakers try to come up with a way to replenish the Department of Transportation's depleted Highway Trust Fund before a predicted August bankruptcy date. The traditional funding source fo
July 10, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
The US Government House Ways and Means Committee is proposing a US$10.5 billion, eight-month transportation funding bill to push the debate over road and transit spending into the next Congress.  

The proposal, which calls for a temporary extension of current transportation funding levels until 31 May 2015, comes as lawmakers try to come up with a way to replenish the Department of Transportation's depleted Highway Trust Fund before a predicted August bankruptcy date.

The traditional funding source for transportation projects has been revenue collected from the 18.4 cents per gallon federal gas tax. The Department of Transportation (DOT) has said that the gap between gas tax revenue and the current level of federal road and transit spending is around US$16 billion per year.

The DOT has said it will begin cutting back on payments to state and local governments on 1 August unless Congress reaches an infrastructure funding deal.

The House Joint Committee on Taxation said the proposal would reauthorise the collection of the gas tax for eight months and transfer US$10.5 billion from elsewhere in the federal budget to close the Highway Trust Fund shortfall. This includes using US$7.7 billion marked for highways and $2 billion for public transportation systems from the federal government's general fund. The proposal would also take US$1 billion from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund, a funding mechanism also used in the last transportation funding bill that was approved by lawmakers in 2012.

The House has previously considered tying transportation funding to cutbacks at the US postal service, but that plan was controversial with Democrats and labour groups that represented both transportation and postal workers.

Transportation advocates, as well as a few lawmakers, have pushed for an increase in the gas tax for the first time since 1993 to help pay for infrastructure funding. Congress has been reluctant to ask drivers to pay more in the middle of an election year, however, and the White House has also said it opposes such a hike.

Under the Ways and Means committee proposal, the transportation funding would be offset by US$6.4 billion revenue from federal pension changes and US$3.5 billion from the customs fees paid by travellers who use US customs facilities.

“While it doesn’t provide as much funding as I would like – enough to get through the end of next year – it does give Congress and the tax-writing Committees ample time to consider a more long-term solution to the Highway Trust Fund,” Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp said. “A funding package that would get to the end of next year would have required both sides to make much tougher decisions – something that sadly Washington does not appear capable of doing at this time,” Camp continued.

Related Content

  • Cubic voices opposition to proposed cuts in pre-tax benefits for mass transit
    August 8, 2013
    Cubic Transportation Systems has voiced its opposition to the proposed cuts in pre-tax benefits for the Transit Benefit Program available to citizens who use public transportation. Within the Senate Finance Committee, Senators are considering reducing the pre-tax benefit to individuals using public transportation from its current US$245 per month to US$125 per month, close to a 50 per cent cut. Cubic believes it is in the Committee’s best interest to maintain the current transit benefit since promoting pub
  • Report on the impact of recession on infrastructure funding worldwide
    May 10, 2012
    A new report examines how aggressive government belt-tightening and financial market deleveraging restrained worldwide infrastructure investments for 2012 and probably for the next five years. In the US, for instance, Infrastructure2012: Spotlight on Leadership, released by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and Ernst & Young, says that constrained public budgets and a growing recognition at the local level of the importance of infrastructure, combined with lack of action at the federal level, are causing state
  • Countering falling fuel tax revenue with mileage fees
    April 20, 2016
    Eric G. O’Rear and Wallace E. Tyner look at the benefits of mileage charges and how these might be implemented. Since the early 1900s, taxes on petrol (gasoline) and diesel fuels have been used to finance the construction and maintenance of roadway infrastructure and, in some countries other government spending too. Now, a combination of improved fuel economy, the advent of hybrid and alternative fuelled vehicles and a reluctance in some countries (especially the US) to increase fuel taxes has led to a d
  • Confusing funding and financing can be costly
    September 23, 2014
    Tolling may be the way forward for paying for the roads of the future - but where will concessionaires find the money and do they need funding or financing? Increasingly, governments around the world are concluding that they can no longer pay for new roads and are turning to the private sector for help.