Skip to main content

Giving pedestrians more time at lights will reduce injuries: report

7-second 'head start' has significant impact, say Columbia University researchers
By Adam Hill July 28, 2025 Read time: 2 mins
Biggest effect of LPIs was seen during daylight hours, when fatal pedestrian crashes dropped by 65% (© Matthias Wolf | Dreamstime.com)

Giving pedestrians more time to cross the road at traffic lights leads to a significant drop in fatal and non-fatal injuries, according to new research.

In part this is due to making pedestrians more visible to drivers who are legally turning at the same crossing.

The study from Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health looked at 6,003 intersections in New York City between 2013 and 2018.

Of these, 2,869 had leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) of 7-11 seconds - this means pedestrians can begin crossing before vehicles get a green light to turn.

“The idea is to give pedestrians time to reach the centre of the intersection where they’re more visible,” said lead author Christopher Morrison, PhD, assistant professor of epidemiology at Columbia Mailman School. 

"Most pedestrian-vehicle crashes happen near the kerb, where drivers are less likely to see people crossing.”

Having this 'head start' at lights is associated with a 33% reduction in total pedestrian injuries at intersections in the city - consistent across all intersection types - researchers found.

The biggest effect was seen during daylight hours, when fatal pedestrian crashes dropped by 65%.

“LPIs are one of the most affordable and scalable traffic safety interventions,” Morrison adds. 

“A seven-second delay for drivers can mean the difference between life and death for pedestrians. Our findings show they work—and could be adopted more widely.”

The research team focused on pedestrian injuries occurring within 100 feet of a signalised intersection. 

Intersections within 10 feet of an LPI were categorised as 'treated'; those beyond 10 feet were considered 'untreated'.

In the US, over 68,000 pedestrian deaths and 6.1 million serious pedestrian injuries occurred between 2011 and 2020, the researchers say.

Funding for the research was provided by the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Self-driving car safety perspectives
    June 2, 2015
    At yesterday’s Opening Plenary, Chris Urmson’s keynote speech dealt with the reality of driverless cars on our roads. By far and away their greatest benefit to mankind will be the potential to achieve an incredible saving of life and injury on the roads, as Urmson, director of the Google Self-Driving Car program, revealed to delegates. In response to an Associated Press article last month disclosing that self-driving cars have been involved in four accidents in the state of California, Urmson revealed th
  • Report analyses multiple ITS projects to highlight cost and benefits
    March 16, 2015
    Every year in America cost benefit analysis is carried out on dozens of ITS installations and pilot studies and the findings, along with the lessons learned, are entered into the Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) web-based ITS Knowledge Resources database. This database holds more than 1,600 reports and periodically the USDOT reviews the material on file to draw conclusions from this wider body of evidence. It has just published one such review ITS Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned: 2014 Update Re
  • Hikvision maximises safety with smart video technology
    September 12, 2022
    Around the world, thousands of people are injured or killed in road traffic accidents every day. To maximise safety for motorists and other road users, cities and highways authorities are implementing smart video solutions that alert emergency teams when an accident occurs in real time – supporting faster responses and potentially saving lives, says Juan Sádaba, ITS business development manager at Hikvision Spain
  • Support for speed cameras remains high – but some drivers need convincing
    October 29, 2015
    A national survey by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) has shown that although most drivers support speed cameras there are big variations across the country – and Londoners and people in the north-east appear to show higher levels of resistance than most. The survey polled 1,000 drivers of all age groups across Britain and asked “It is now common for the authorities to use speed cameras at the side of the road to identify vehicles involved in speeding offences. How acceptable do you think this i