Skip to main content

Foxx: US needs to invest more in infrastructure

US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx predicted there would be a repeat of this summer’s infrastructure funding debate in Congress next year despite the likelihood of US$10.9 billion bill, passed by the House, becoming law before the end of this month. Foxx said during an interview with MSNBC’s Ed Schultz on Tuesday evening that the House-passed legislation failed to address the long-term issues that have been plaguing federal transportation funding for years. “What’s going on in Capitol Hill right
July 18, 2014 Read time: 2 mins

US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx predicted there would be a repeat of this summer’s infrastructure funding debate in Congress next year despite the likelihood of US$10.9 billion bill, passed by the House, becoming law before the end of this month.

Foxx said during an interview with MSNBC’s Ed Schultz on Tuesday evening that the House-passed legislation failed to address the long-term issues that have been plaguing federal transportation funding for years.  “What’s going on in Capitol Hill right now is folks have been scouring around trying to get a few more months to consider this issue again, but we'll be right back here in next spring if it passes,” he said.

The measure would provide US$10.9 billion to extend federal transportation until May 2015. Democrats had hoped for a multi-year bill that could have included an increase in the 18.4 cents per gallon gas tax, which is the traditional transportation funding source. Republicans in the House resisted the push to increase the gas tax, however, turning to other areas of the federal budget like pension changes and custom fees for transportation funding.

The House package would only be enough to carry transportation funding until next spring because the Department of Transportation has said that there is a shortfall of around US$16 billion in its Highway Trust Fund.

Foxx blamed Republican resistance to consider a long-term fix on pressure from outside conservative groups in his post-vote interview. He said he was glad lawmakers were moving to prevent a bankruptcy in transportation funding that he had warned for months would occur next month, but eventually Congress was going to have to address the root of the infrastructure problem and come up with a transportation funding source, however.

Foxx concluded that “we need to invest in infrastructure and we need to be doing more of it than we've been doing.”

Related Content

  • America explores road user charging options
    November 27, 2017
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax in
  • Autumn budget: EV charging infrastructure fund and higher tax rates for diesel vehicles
    November 23, 2017
    Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond has announced a £400m ($532m) charging infrastructure fund for electric vehicles (EVs), an extra £100m ($133m) investment in Plug-In-Car Grant, and a £40m ($53m) in charging R&D in the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017. He added that laws need to be clarified so that motorists who charge their EVs at work will not face a benefit-in-kind charge from next year.
  • Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    February 2, 2012
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.
  • Managing congestion, better information changes perceptions
    January 31, 2012
    Kapsch's Dietrich Leihs talks about the true fundamentals of urban pricing. In some Italian and German towns and cities, the solution to congestion is an outright ban on certain types of vehicles. As far as Dietrich Leihs is concerned, any attempt to sweeten the pill that is congestion charging is only ever going to be a partial success at best.