Skip to main content

Foxx: US needs to invest more in infrastructure

US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx predicted there would be a repeat of this summer’s infrastructure funding debate in Congress next year despite the likelihood of US$10.9 billion bill, passed by the House, becoming law before the end of this month. Foxx said during an interview with MSNBC’s Ed Schultz on Tuesday evening that the House-passed legislation failed to address the long-term issues that have been plaguing federal transportation funding for years. “What’s going on in Capitol Hill right
July 18, 2014 Read time: 2 mins

US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx predicted there would be a repeat of this summer’s infrastructure funding debate in Congress next year despite the likelihood of US$10.9 billion bill, passed by the House, becoming law before the end of this month.

Foxx said during an interview with MSNBC’s Ed Schultz on Tuesday evening that the House-passed legislation failed to address the long-term issues that have been plaguing federal transportation funding for years.  “What’s going on in Capitol Hill right now is folks have been scouring around trying to get a few more months to consider this issue again, but we'll be right back here in next spring if it passes,” he said.

The measure would provide US$10.9 billion to extend federal transportation until May 2015. Democrats had hoped for a multi-year bill that could have included an increase in the 18.4 cents per gallon gas tax, which is the traditional transportation funding source. Republicans in the House resisted the push to increase the gas tax, however, turning to other areas of the federal budget like pension changes and custom fees for transportation funding.

The House package would only be enough to carry transportation funding until next spring because the Department of Transportation has said that there is a shortfall of around US$16 billion in its Highway Trust Fund.

Foxx blamed Republican resistance to consider a long-term fix on pressure from outside conservative groups in his post-vote interview. He said he was glad lawmakers were moving to prevent a bankruptcy in transportation funding that he had warned for months would occur next month, but eventually Congress was going to have to address the root of the infrastructure problem and come up with a transportation funding source, however.

Foxx concluded that “we need to invest in infrastructure and we need to be doing more of it than we've been doing.”

Related Content

  • Silos are last century’s thinking
    April 21, 2016
    After 45 years in transportation, Ken Philmus sees the need for major change in a sector currently ill-prepared to meet the challenge of funding and rapidly advancing technological change. Having worked in both the public and private sectors, Ken Philmus, currently senior vice president of transportation solutions at Xerox, appreciates both approaches, but times are changing and he believes the sector needs to change too. “I like trains, planes and automobiles but I love the concept of mobility and that’s w
  • EVs: Time for a rethink
    December 14, 2021
    Given a growing body of evidence that EVs are not the clean, green machines they are made out to be, Andrew Bunn suggests they can only be part of the puzzle – not the answer to environmental problems
  • Oregon trials road user charging
    February 11, 2013
    In Oregon, gas-tax money funds about 58 per cent of the budget used to take care of the state’s roads. As vehicles become more fuel efficient, the gas tax, which is 30 cents a gallon in Oregon and 37 cents in Washington, will generate less and less money. “If we’re using gasoline and diesel sales to fund our transportation system, we’re going to be in big trouble,” said Patrick Cooney of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Recognizing the problem early, Oregon started studying alternatives to th
  • Seleta Reynolds: 'Drivers don't pay full cost'
    August 29, 2022
    Newly-appointed chief innovation officer at LA Metro suggests congestion pricing will help