Skip to main content

Excessive lighting is safety issue

A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few Europea
May 21, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, 5657 Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few European nations such as Sweden have a requirement for the use of daytime running lights. However some European countries, such as Austria, did introduce regulations requiring the use of daytime running lights on all vehicles but later reversed this move following a 12% increase in accidents amongst vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.

According to Lightmare, the issue of drivers being dazzled is a hazard that is a cause of many accidents, particularly at night and in rural areas where there is no street lighting. In such areas, the powerful beams from high intensity lights can easily dazzle drivers in oncoming vehicles and result in perception failures that lead to dangerous, high impact, head-on crashes. Meanwhile the use of daytime running lights results in light pollution that rather than improving conspicuity, in fact reduces the chances of vulnerable road users from being seen.

There is concern that a European-wide requirement for daytime running lights amongst vehicle users will increase accident levels and prove a negative effect on road safety. Lightmare believes that vulnerable road users will then bear the brunt as drivers will fail to see high visibility clothing due to the excessive light pollution. In Austria, data from traffic experts helped in the removal of the daytime running light regulations. This information provided statistics on children and cyclists being involved in accidents and this showed that compulsory daytime running lights provided an additional hazard rather than a safety benefit. Other safety campaigners in the USA and Australia have compiled similar information according to Lightmare, which says that driving while dazzled is becoming a major road safety issue worldwide.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Driving forward cooperative intersection safety applications
    July 24, 2012
    Gregory Davis, FHWA, John Harding, NHTSA, and Mike Schagrin, ITS Joint Program Office (RITA) chart the course for cooperative intersection safety applications being pursued as part of the IntelliDrive programme. Crashes at intersections accounted for 8,703 highway fatalities in the US in 2008. Research and development is moving forward on IntelliDriveSM safety applications designed to help drivers avoid intersection accidents. These new safety systems could substantially drive down the highway death and inj
  • Need for balance on UK speed enforcement funding cuts
    February 2, 2012
    Trevor Ellis, Chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the implications of the UK Government's decision to withdraw funding for road safety camera partnerships
  • Regulating rural road use
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford looks at problems facing indigenous communities and those unfamiliar with driving in rural areas. While it is well known that the fatality rate for road crashes in rural areas is higher than in towns and cities, some groups suffer far more than others. For instance, the rates of death and serious injury from vehicle accidents is much higher for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI and AN) populations living in rural tribal lands than for any of the country’s other ethnic populations. Crashes
  • Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: a solution or another problem?
    November 27, 2013
    Do Advanced Driver Assistance Systems represent a positive step forward for safety, or something of a safety risk? Jason Barnes discusses the issue with leading industry figures. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are already common. Anti-lock brakes or electronic stability control are well understood and are either fitted as standard or frequently requested by new vehicle buyers. More advanced ADAS features are appearing on many top-end vehicles and the trickle-down has already started. Adaptive