Skip to main content

Excessive lighting is safety issue

A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few Europea
May 21, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, 5657 Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few European nations such as Sweden have a requirement for the use of daytime running lights. However some European countries, such as Austria, did introduce regulations requiring the use of daytime running lights on all vehicles but later reversed this move following a 12% increase in accidents amongst vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.

According to Lightmare, the issue of drivers being dazzled is a hazard that is a cause of many accidents, particularly at night and in rural areas where there is no street lighting. In such areas, the powerful beams from high intensity lights can easily dazzle drivers in oncoming vehicles and result in perception failures that lead to dangerous, high impact, head-on crashes. Meanwhile the use of daytime running lights results in light pollution that rather than improving conspicuity, in fact reduces the chances of vulnerable road users from being seen.

There is concern that a European-wide requirement for daytime running lights amongst vehicle users will increase accident levels and prove a negative effect on road safety. Lightmare believes that vulnerable road users will then bear the brunt as drivers will fail to see high visibility clothing due to the excessive light pollution. In Austria, data from traffic experts helped in the removal of the daytime running light regulations. This information provided statistics on children and cyclists being involved in accidents and this showed that compulsory daytime running lights provided an additional hazard rather than a safety benefit. Other safety campaigners in the USA and Australia have compiled similar information according to Lightmare, which says that driving while dazzled is becoming a major road safety issue worldwide.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Enforcement a key part of the road safety solution
    January 31, 2012
    The Partnership for Advancing Road Safety is a new organisation set up in the US to push the national debate on speed and intersection safety, something which hitherto has been absent. Here, executive director David Kelly explains the organisation's work. With moves to address drink/drug driving and the wearing of seatbelts starting to prove successful in the US, the use of inappropriate speed and poor driving at intersections have become responsible for a proportionately greater number of the deaths and in
  • Slow development of Europe's road user charging
    April 24, 2013
    Delegates convened in Brussels for Europe’s 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in March, when both positive and negative developments came to light for advocates of more widespread introduction of RUC. Jon Masters reports. Goings on across Europe in recent months have again demonstrated how very sensitive road user charging (RUC) is politically. At the 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in Brussels at the beginning of March, a Danish delegation was notable for its absence, but Belgian governme
  • Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    June 14, 2018
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s