Excessive lighting is safety issue

A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few Europea
May 21, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
A UK-based group has set up an Internet-based petition to tackle the safety issue of drivers being dazzled by lights from other vehicles. The organisation, 5657 Lightmare, is the combination of two road sector groups that have campaigned against the improper use of vehicle lights in daytime and against the particular hazard posed by high intensity xenon lighting. The issue is a key one as there is a move towards all EC nations requiring the use of daytime running lights on vehicles. At present only a few European nations such as Sweden have a requirement for the use of daytime running lights. However some European countries, such as Austria, did introduce regulations requiring the use of daytime running lights on all vehicles but later reversed this move following a 12% increase in accidents amongst vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians.

According to Lightmare, the issue of drivers being dazzled is a hazard that is a cause of many accidents, particularly at night and in rural areas where there is no street lighting. In such areas, the powerful beams from high intensity lights can easily dazzle drivers in oncoming vehicles and result in perception failures that lead to dangerous, high impact, head-on crashes. Meanwhile the use of daytime running lights results in light pollution that rather than improving conspicuity, in fact reduces the chances of vulnerable road users from being seen.

There is concern that a European-wide requirement for daytime running lights amongst vehicle users will increase accident levels and prove a negative effect on road safety. Lightmare believes that vulnerable road users will then bear the brunt as drivers will fail to see high visibility clothing due to the excessive light pollution. In Austria, data from traffic experts helped in the removal of the daytime running light regulations. This information provided statistics on children and cyclists being involved in accidents and this showed that compulsory daytime running lights provided an additional hazard rather than a safety benefit. Other safety campaigners in the USA and Australia have compiled similar information according to Lightmare, which says that driving while dazzled is becoming a major road safety issue worldwide.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Workzone safety can be economically viable
    October 24, 2014
    David Crawford looks how workzone safety can be ‘economically viable’. Highway maintenance is one of the most dangerous construction industry occupations in Europe. Research from The Netherlands on fatal crashes indicates that the risk facing road workzone operatives is ‘significantly higher’ than that for the general construction workforce. A survey carried out by the Highways Agency, which runs the UK’s motorway and trunk road network, has suggested that 20% of road workers have suffered injuries from pa
    Read More
  • Copenhagen to showcase ITS in action at ITSWC 2018
    December 18, 2017
    As delegates head for the 2017 ITS World Congress in Montreal, we talk to Copenhagen mayor Morten Kabell about why his city is the ideal location for next year’s event. It may have been a long time coming but the ITS World Congress will be in Copenhagen in 2018 and there can be few more fitting places to host the event. By any number of metrics - interconnected transport, cycle commuting, safer streets, reduced pollution, sustainable energy and quality of life - the Danish capital has implemented what m
    Read More
  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
    Read More
  • In-vehicle warning systems ‘reduce risk of run-off-the-road crashes’
    August 27, 2015
    In-vehicle lane-departure warning systems can help reduce the risk of dangerous run-off-the-road crashes, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Minnesota’s HumanFIRST Laboratory. “Run-off-the-road crashes are a huge concern, especially in rural areas,” says project co-investigator Jennifer Cooper, a HumanFIRST Lab assistant scientist. “Crash statistics tell us they contribute to more than half of all vehicle fatalities nationwide and that these crashes occur most often on two-la
    Read More

Highlighted Content