Skip to main content

EV survey finds strongest interest in Japan, Russia

Research organisation GFK recently released the results of a 2013 survey on electric vehicles (EVs) that focused on consumer attitudes in six different countries. The research found that the strongest market opportunities lie in Japan and Russia where three-quarters or more of those responding had a favourable impression of electric vehicles. Spain comes in third with two-thirds having a favourable opinion. Researchers placed the US in fifth position, with only 36 per cent holding a favourable impressio
August 27, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
Research organisation GFK recently released the results of a 2013 survey on electric vehicles (EVs) that focused on consumer attitudes in six different countries.

The research found that the strongest market opportunities lie in Japan and Russia where three-quarters or more of those responding had a favourable impression of electric vehicles. Spain comes in third with two-thirds having a favourable opinion. Researchers placed the  US in fifth position, with only 36 per cent holding a favourable impression of EVs, while China comes last with only one in six holding a favourable impression of the electric vehicle.

GFK’s analysis states that the main barrier is that EVs are seen as having a high purchase price and high maintenance costs. Customers in the US are not willing to pay more for electric cars compared to conventional engine cars, and they would like to see a wider range of choices.

GFK’s Don DeVeaux noted: “In Japan, which has by far the highest familiarity with EVs, it is the direct personal benefits that are most associated with them, such as ‘easy to operate,’ ‘safe’ and ‘reliable.’ But in the USA, China, Russia, France, and, to a lesser extent, Spain, it’s the other way around. In these markets, most respondents associate EVs primarily with the indirect benefit of ‘low emissions’ and have little perception of them as delivering direct personal benefits. If manufacturers focus on promoting the direct personal benefits of their electric vehicles in these countries, they will open up significant opportunities.”

Related Content

  • 3M sees big potential in ITS sector
    December 16, 2013
    Having re-entered the ITS market, 3M is busy shaping the future technology for vehicle detection, tolling and parking, as Colin Sowman discovers. Having sold off its Opticom business in 2007, 3M effectively re-entered the ITS market last year paying $110 million for Federal Signal Technology Group (FSTech) – but why?
  • How can US transportation be ‘re-envisioned’?
    October 17, 2019
    In her address to this year’s ITS America Annual Meeting, congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, chair of the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, called for a ‘re-envisioning’ of transportation. Her speech is below – and ITS International asks a number of US experts what they would like to see ‘re-envisioned’…

    I would like to welcome  ITS America to the nation’s capital.

  • Transportation survey – industry on the move
    August 19, 2013
    US technology company AirSage has conducted what it says is the first in an annual look at the transportation industry and the professionals in it – with some interesting findings. Just released as an eBook, the AirSage Annual Transportation Industry Survey: an Industry on the Move, provides an insight into how US-based transportation planners and traffic engineers peers view the industry, their organisations, private versus government jobs, gender and age issues and more. Conducted During May and June 2013
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen