Skip to main content

EU ‘working on technology that would allow police to remotely disable cars’

Leaked confidential documents from a committee of senior European Union police officers indicate that the EU is developing a ‘remote stopping’ device that would be fitted to all cars and allow police to disable vehicles at the flick of a switch as part of wider law enforcement surveillance and tracking measures. According to the documents, the project will work on a technological solution that can be a 'build in standard' for all cars that enter the European market and is aimed at bringing dangerous hig
January 30, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Leaked confidential documents from a committee of senior 1816 European Union police officers indicate that the EU is developing a ‘remote stopping’ device that would be fitted to all cars and allow police to disable vehicles at the flick of a switch  as part of wider law enforcement surveillance and tracking measures.

According to the documents, the project will work on a technological solution that can be a 'build in standard' for all cars that enter the European market and is aimed at bringing dangerous high-speed car chases to an end and to make redundant techniques such as spiking tyres.

The devices, which could be in all new cars by the end of the decade, would be activated by a police officer working from a computer in a central control room. Once enabled, the suspect vehicle's fuel supply would be cut and the ignition switched off, bringing it to a halt.

Statewatch, a watchdog monitoring police powers, state surveillance and civil liberties in the EU, has leaked the documents amid concerns that the technology poses a serious threat to civil liberties. "Let's have some evidence that this is a problem, and then let's have some guidelines on how this would be used," said Tony Bunyan, the director of Statewatch.

According to news reports, Douglas Carswell, a Conservative MP, said the plan threatened civil liberties and bypassed parliament. Nigel Farage, the leader of Ukip, said the measure was "incredible" and a "draconian imposition". "It is appalling they are even thinking of it," he said.

Enlets argues the technology's merits. "Cars on the run can be dangerous for citizens," a document states. "Criminal offenders will take risks to escape after a crime. In most cases the police are unable to chase the criminal due to a lack of efficient means to stop the vehicle safely."

Related Content

  • More thought needed on ITS privacy and data protection
    February 27, 2012
    It's long been the case that policy should drive technology and not the other way round.
  • Technology, social media bigger perceived threats than drink-driving, IAM finds
    November 6, 2015
    Motorists are now more worried about the dangers of distraction posed by technology and social media than drink-driving, according to the Institute of Advanced Motorist’s (IAM) first major survey into safety culture. The Safety Culture Index report was launched today by the IAM, and is a study of more than 2,000 UK motorists’ attitudes to driving safety and behaviour on our roads. IAM claims it will form a definitive baseline to track changes over time, providing the opportunity to examine how attitudes
  • Reduce fatal crashes? Get police on the road
    July 8, 2019
    There are many elements to speed enforcement - but research suggests there is a strong correlation between getting police on the roads and reducing fatal collisions There are a variety of elements which go into successful speed enforcement. The European Union’s blueprint for this (see 10 Rules…) ranges from prioritising roads to offender education courses, and from legislation to data. But research suggests that one of the key factors is visibility – drivers need to see technology in action or police on
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.