Skip to main content

EU support for development of an intermodal road-rail terminal in Tarragona

The EU's TEN-T Programme is to provide over US$1 million to support an engineering study on an open terminal allowing the shift between rail and road cargo transport in Tarragona, Spain. The study will prepare grounds for the construction of the terminal after the permits are issued. The new terminal will help reduce both freight transport costs and CO2 emissions, as well as improve overall safety. It will have 115,000 loading units capacity per year, equivalent to eight trains per day and 2.3 million m
March 27, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
The EU's TEN-T Programme is to provide over US$1 million  to support an engineering study on an open terminal allowing the shift between rail and road cargo transport in Tarragona, Spain. The study will prepare grounds for the construction of the terminal after the permits are issued.

The new terminal will help reduce both freight transport costs and CO2 emissions, as well as improve overall safety. It will have 115,000 loading units capacity per year, equivalent to eight trains per day and 2.3 million metric tonnes per year. The terminal will contain access and siding tracks, an operation area with rail tracks under the gantry crane and container zone, a container depot for dangerous and non-dangerous goods, a check-in and office building, and a parking area for trucks and freight containers.

The project will come up with the technical design, engineering studies and submission of requests for administrative authorisations leading to the construction. It was selected for EU funding with the assistance of external experts under the TEN-T Annual Call 2013, priority 'Multimodal transport'. Its implementation will be monitored by INEA, the 1690 European Commission's Innovation and Networks Executive Agency and is to be completed by December 2015.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • VW scandal prompts emissions testing debate
    December 1, 2015
    In the wake of the VW scandal John Kendall looks at emissions testing on both sides of the Atlantic. Since the VW emissions story broke in September, emissions testing has come under greater scrutiny, and none more so than in Europe, where critics have long been highlighting the weaknesses of the testing system. Ironically, changes to the emissions testing process were already under review but the story has pushed it up the agenda.
  • Conscience versus convenience
    June 8, 2015
    David Crawford looks at new ways forward for public transport. By 2025, nearly 60% of the world’s population will be living in towns and cities, increasing their extent and density, and the journeys that people make within and between them. In response, the International Association of Public Transport (UITP) wants to see public transport’s global modal share doubling (PTx2) by the same date. “Success in 2025,” a spokesperson told ITS International, “will save 170 million tonnes of oil equivalent and 550
  • Gothenburg’s year of congestion charging
    April 9, 2014
    A year after it went live, Colin Sowman examines the technology used for Gothenburg’s congestion charging system and the effect the scheme has had on commuters. When it comes to long-term planning, the Scandinavians take some beating.The West Swedish Agreement is a case in point. Introduced in 2009, the Agreement runs through to around 2027 and aims to create an attractive, sustainable and growing region, and over that timescale the number of journeys is expected to increase by a third. Therefore the Agreem
  • Infrastructure funding and road user charging – debate continues
    February 1, 2012
    Jack Opiola provides an overview of the ongoing debate over US infrastructure funding and the progress – or lack of it – towards vehicles miles travelled road user charging. The future funding of transportation and mobility infrastructure is attracting increased attention. There has been sharp debate in the US, where landmark reports from the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission both stated that the cu