EU court rules Uber must be regarded as a transport company

A ruling by an representative of the Court of Justice of the European Union has dealt a potential blow to ride-hailing company Uber, saying it is not merely a digital enabler but provides a transport service, which means it must be licensed in order to operate.
May 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

A ruling by an representative of the Court of Justice of the European Union has dealt a potential blow to ride-hailing company 8336 Uber, saying it is not merely a digital enabler but provides a transport service, which means it must be licensed in order to operate.

In his ruling, Advocate General Maciej Szpunar, said the Uber electronic platform, whilst innovative, falls within the field of transport. Uber can therefore be required to obtain the necessary licences and authorisations under national law.

The case was brought in 2014 by a group of taxi drivers in Barcelona, Spain, which argued that Uber engaged in unfair competition with its UberPOP service, which used unlicensed drivers.

According to Reuters, Uber no longer operates UberPOP in Spain. The company said it would await a final ruling later this year, but added that even if it is considered a transportation company, this "would not change the way we are regulated in most EU countries as that is already the situation today".

The decision is not binding, but the court's judges follow it in most cases.

Related Content

  • April 12, 2013
    Connected vehicles - potential to transform US transportation
    There’s a new face in the driving seat at the US Department of Transport’s ITS Joint Program Office. Fortunately, as Robin Meczes finds out, he’s no learner driver… Ask Kenneth Leonard why he wanted his new job as director of the ITS Joint Program Office, and his answer comes back without a second’s delay. “The potential to save lives, reduce injuries and help people enjoy a more efficient transportation system is the kind of challenge that makes me want to come to work each morning,” he says. “In my opinio
    Read More
  • May 29, 2013
    ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen
    Read More
  • February 3, 2012
    Cooperative infrastructure systems waiting for the go ahead
    Despite much research and technological promise, progress towards cooperative infrastructure system deployment is still slow. Here, Robert Cone and John Miles take a considered look at how and when it might come about. From a systems engineering viewpoint it looks logical and inevitable that vehicles should be communicating between themselves and with the road infrastructure. But seen from a business viewpoint the case is not proven.
    Read More
  • February 2, 2012
    US enforcement regulation to deliver clearer guidelines?
    Jim Tuton of American Traffic Solutions looks at the evolution of automated enforcement in North America "Technological regulation will become more sophisticated at the federal level, giving states clearer guidelines" Jim Tuton In just 20 years, photo enforcement in North America has grown from a single speed camera in a small town in Arizona to thousands of photo traffic enforcement cameras which are now operating in 350 communities spread across 27 states and three Canadian provinces. Most of these p
    Read More

Highlighted Content