EU court rules Uber must be regarded as a transport company

A ruling by an representative of the Court of Justice of the European Union has dealt a potential blow to ride-hailing company Uber, saying it is not merely a digital enabler but provides a transport service, which means it must be licensed in order to operate.
May 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

A ruling by an representative of the Court of Justice of the European Union has dealt a potential blow to ride-hailing company 8336 Uber, saying it is not merely a digital enabler but provides a transport service, which means it must be licensed in order to operate.

In his ruling, Advocate General Maciej Szpunar, said the Uber electronic platform, whilst innovative, falls within the field of transport. Uber can therefore be required to obtain the necessary licences and authorisations under national law.

The case was brought in 2014 by a group of taxi drivers in Barcelona, Spain, which argued that Uber engaged in unfair competition with its UberPOP service, which used unlicensed drivers.

According to Reuters, Uber no longer operates UberPOP in Spain. The company said it would await a final ruling later this year, but added that even if it is considered a transportation company, this "would not change the way we are regulated in most EU countries as that is already the situation today".

The decision is not binding, but the court's judges follow it in most cases.

Related Content

  • October 22, 2018
    The long road to Spanish enlightenment
    Julián Núñez, immediate past president of ASECAP, gets his teeth into the vision of a European strategy for toll roads. David Arminas reports from Madrid. Getting European politicians to agree to a long-term cross-border highway infrastructure programme for toll roads is extremely difficult. It’s a bit like pulling teeth: people want to avoid the pain. But pain is something that Spanish operators, including Abertis, OHL, ACS, FCC and Acciona, have been going through for the past decade. The country has
    Read More
  • April 12, 2013
    Mexico and the US slow to adopt ETC interoperability
    Splinteroperability is a word devised by Travis P. Dunn and Victor J. Michelet C. to encapsulate the lack of progress towards ETC harmonisation in the US and Mexico. Five thousand miles of tolled roads and bridges. Widespread implementation of electronic toll collection (ETC) systems. One dominant interoperable ETC service provider covering just over half the nation’s toll facilities. Numerous other ETC service providers offering alternative visions of interoperability. Years of customer requests for better
    Read More
  • July 30, 2013
    Kapsch ‘opens the way’ to interoperability
    Richard Turnock, chief technology officer of Kapsch TrafficCom North America explains what advantages its newly-opened TDM protocol can offer as a US-wide standard for tolling interoperability. The electronic tolling industry across the United States is evolving. Historically it was characterised by clusters of interoperability where a motorist may be able to use the same transponder across a large area, such as the 15-State E-ZPass system, or be confined to a single State system. Now, however, the industry
    Read More
  • November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
    Read More

Highlighted Content