Skip to main content

Deloitte Research releases smart mobility report

Deloitte's Public Sector Research organisation has released a report titled, Smart Mobility: Reducing congestion and fostering faster, greener, and cheaper transportation options, which indicates that the expansion of alternative modes of transportation could lead to reduced congestion and other benefits, and identified the types of transportation suited to a city or suburb. The study uses geospatial analytics, such as coupling location data with existing government data, to examine the potential conges
May 20, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
1979 Deloitte's Public Sector Research organisation has released a report titled, Smart Mobility: Reducing congestion and fostering faster, greener, and cheaper transportation options, which indicates that the expansion of alternative modes of transportation could lead to reduced congestion and other benefits, and identified the types of transportation suited to a city or suburb.

The study uses geospatial analytics, such as coupling location data with existing government data, to examine the potential congestion reduction benefits in major metropolitan areas across the US. Congestion reduction could result from the expansion of alternative modes of commuting including:  ridesharing services (carpooling), bike commuting, car-sharing and on-demand ride services.

To understand which major metropolitan areas potentially stand to gain the most congestion relief from these alternative mobility strategies, Deloitte analysed commuter-behaviour data at the census-tract level. Deloitte then formulated estimates on the potential savings if commuters who could reasonably use alternative commuting modes did so and found that:

•    Ridesharing has the potential to offer US$30.3 billion in annual savings to individuals and cities from reduced congestions, deferred road construction, safety improvements and lower carbon emissions. Ridesharing could also reduce annual traffic accidents by 22,915 and lower carbon emissions by 9.1 million metric tons annually. 

•    Bike commuting has nearly the same potential benefits as ride sharing with US$27.6 billion in annual savings spread between commuters and cities, and reduced annual carbon emissions of 5 million metric tons.  
•    Car-sharing could provide up to US$3 billion in annual savings to individuals and cities from reduced congestion, deferred road construction and lower carbon emissions. Car-sharing could lower annual accidents by 1,391 and carbon emissions by nearly 6.6 metric tons annually. 

•    On-demand ride services have the potential to reach underserved portions of cities. Substituting shared rides for some taxi trips could reduce total taxi trip miles in some cities by as much as 30 percent – thereby contributing to reduced congestion.  

"This report utilises open government data on commuting to determine the feasibility of alternative modes of transportation," says William D. Eggers, director of public sector research at Deloitte Services LP. "Our data analysis demonstrates that alternative mobility services can help reduce traffic congestion, lower the number of traffic accidents and fatalities, and improve air quality, in most cases at a far lower cost than traditional approaches to congestion reduction."

The report found that the potential benefits from these four modes are distributed differently across America's cities and within each city. Car-sharing works well in dense urban cores. On-demand ride services extend services to underserved portions of cities. Ridesharing provides returns in a ring 10 to 15 miles outside a city centre, and bike commuting benefits neighbourhoods in the urban core and clustered around suburban commercial centres.

Based on the report findings, the arrival and increasing popularity of dynamic, smart mobility services can offer promising new possibilities for making more efficient use of existing infrastructure. At a fraction of the cost of new roads, smart mobility ecosystems can help reduce gridlock, lower accident rates, improve air quality, and shrink the urban footprint required for parking.

Incorporated in the report are statistical analyses on the possible congestion savings metropolitan areas could achieve if each alternative mode were implemented.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Fast moving walkways could move 7,000 people per hour
    November 28, 2016
    Researchers at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) researchers have been studying futuristic transport solutions for car-free urban centres and have come up with an optimal design for a network of accelerating moving walkways. This is not a new concept – the first moving walkways were seen in Chicago in 1893 and seven years later they were used at the world’s fair in Paris. They are also regularly used the world over in airports and transport terminals. As part of the PostCarW
  • Motown morphs into Mobility City
    August 7, 2018
    Detroit was once a byword for urban decay – but ITS America recently held its annual meeting there. This gave David Arminas a chance to assess how fast Motor City is moving down the road to recovery. Motor City, as Detroit is still called, was on its financial knees only five short years ago. The future looked bleak as the city and greater urban area bled jobs and population. It was on 18 July 2013 that Motown, as Detroit is also known, filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection, the
  • Magway delivers future of transport
    January 18, 2021
    A dramatic shift towards e-commerce and home working, plus the need for sustainable deliveries, means future cities are at a crossroads, says Phill Davies of Magway
  • ODoT targets transportation funding solutions and alternatives
    March 22, 2012
    Jerry Wray, Ohio Department of Transportation (ODoT) director, has officially announced the Division of Innovative Delivery, a move he says is critical to identifying innovative and alternative funding solutions and advancing the agency’s goal developing long-term, sustainable solutions to fund future transportation construction projects. By reducing agency costs, commercialising non-interstate rest areas and seeking sponsorship and naming rights for certain infrastructure projects, the Ohio Department of T