Skip to main content

Crashes affect one in three but drivers continue to take risks

According to the AAA Foundation’s latest Traffic Safety Culture Index, too many Americans report that they regularly speed, run red lights, use distracting devices or drive drowsy, despite the fact that one in three have a loved one who has been seriously injured or killed in a crash. The results further find that unsafe behaviour persists even though one in five drivers have themselves been involved in a serious crash, and one in ten has been seriously injured in a crash. These most recent findings from
February 13, 2015 Read time: 3 mins

According to the 4939 AAA Foundation’s latest Traffic Safety Culture Index, too many Americans report that they regularly speed, run red lights, use distracting devices or drive drowsy, despite the fact that one in three have a loved one who has been seriously injured or killed in a crash. The results further find that unsafe behaviour persists even though one in five drivers have themselves been involved in a serious crash, and one in ten has been seriously injured in a crash.

These most recent findings from the Foundation’s annual survey, which assesses and benchmarks the attitudes and behaviour of drivers, revealed that the prevalence of unsafe driving behaviour during the previous 30 days are widespread, including:

Red light running, where more than a third of drivers admit to running red lights, yet 55 per cent say it is a very serious threat and 73 per cent say it is completely unacceptable; Speeding at more than 10mph on residential streets; nearly half of drivers report speeding, yet 65 per cent say it is completely unacceptable; Drowsy driving; about three in ten drivers admitted to drowsy driving, yet 45 per cent say it is a very serious threat and 81 per cent say it is completely unacceptable; Texting/emailing; more than a quarter of drivers report typing or sending a text or email, yet 79 per cent of drivers say it is a very serious threat to safety and 84 per cent say it is completely unacceptable.

When it comes to specific distracted driving b in the past 30 days, two in three drivers reported talking on their cell phone, one in three drivers reported talking on their cell phone often and one in three drivers admit to reading a text message or email.

The findings also offered insight about drivers’ attitudes related to cognitive distraction. Two out of three drivers believe hands-free phone use is acceptable, and nearly half (46 percent) of drivers who report using speech-based in-vehicle systems say they do not believe these systems are at all distracting. These results are prevalent despite extensive research indicating that hands-free devices can lead to cognitive distraction.

“It is very disappointing that we continue to see a prevailing attitude of ‘do as I say, not as I do,’ where large numbers of motorists seem to recognize the risks of certain behaviour but do it anyway,” said Peter Kissinger, president and CEO of the 477 AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. “Enhancing the safety culture in society must begin with each individual.

“Despite the growing body of research that offers evidence about the possible dangers of using hands-free technologies, most drivers don’t understand the risks and continue to use these technologies,” said Kissinger.  “The good news is that we all have the ability to make safer choices, and can personally enhance our safety while driving.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Speed cameras yield long-term safety benefits, IIHS study shows
    September 2, 2015
    A speed-camera program in a large community near Washington, DC, has led to long-term changes in driver behaviour and substantial reductions in deaths and injuries, a study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) shows. Automated speed enforcement is gradually becoming more common around the country but remains relatively rare, with only 138 jurisdictions operating such programs as of last month. According to IIHS, if all US communities had speed-camera programs like the one IIHS studied in
  • Swedish drivers support speed cameras
    March 17, 2014
    In sharp contrast to many other countries drivers in Sweden support speed cameras and the planned expansion of the automated enforcement network. Sweden is embarking on a massive expansion of its speed camera network and is doing so with both a very high level of public acceptance and without its drivers feeling persecuted; a feat the administrations in many other countries would like to emulate. So how did this envious state of affairs come about? Magnus Ferlander director of business development and ma
  • Apple iWatch to significantly impair driving performance says IAM
    September 17, 2014
    Leading road safety charity the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) is warning drivers about the potential risks associated with smart watches while driving. The latest piece of wearable technology from Apple will allow users to make and receive calls, check messages and monitor their health by operating the device on their wrists. However, the IAM warns that this could significantly impair driving performance – a major cause for distraction and road accidents.
  • In-vehicle automation of safety compliance and other traffic violations
    January 24, 2012
    David Crawford explores new initiatives in enforcement. Achieving the EU’s new road safety target of reducing road traffic deaths by 50 per cent by 2020 depends on removing legal and institutional barriers to the deployment of new enforcement technologies, stresses Jan Malenstein. The senior ITS Adviser to Dutch National Police Agency the KLPD, and a European-level spokesperson on road and traffic safety, points to the importance of, among other requirements, an effective EUwide type approval process for fr