Skip to main content

Cost of northern Colombia rail line US$1 billion says study

It would cost nearly US$1 billion to build a 260 kilometre rail line connecting cities in northern Colombia, according to a study by the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla. The proposed rail corridor would link Santa Marta, Barranquilla and Cartagena, which are home to the three biggest ports on the country's Caribbean coast. The train would function as a mixed service line, transporting passengers as well as cargo. "Some details need to be worked out regarding funding sources, which depends more on the
March 18, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
It would cost nearly US$1 billion to build a 260 kilometre rail line connecting cities in northern Colombia, according to a study by the Universidad del Norte in Barranquilla.

The proposed rail corridor would link Santa Marta, Barranquilla and Cartagena, which are home to the three biggest ports on the country's Caribbean coast. The train would function as a mixed service line, transporting passengers as well as cargo.

"Some details need to be worked out regarding funding sources, which depends more on the political will" to carry out the project, local press quoted Víctor Cantillo Maza, a professor of engineering at Universidad del Norte, as saying. "The construction work could be completed in four years."

The Colombian train system has fallen into a state of disrepair due to decades of neglect.
The current government is working to revamp the existing rail lines, as a revitalised train network would help reduce the cost of transporting Colombian goods – particularly coal – to its ports. However, at the moment, most of the country's attention and resources are focused on developing its road infrastructure, namely the US$25 billion 4G highway initiative.

The entire Colombian rail system is nearly 2,000 kilometr4es, according to the transport ministry, though much of it remains out of service. Apart from a couple of small tourist lines, the network is primarily focused on cargo transport.

Related Content

  • US high-speed rail debate revisited
    August 18, 2014
    Two recent columns in the New York Times have revived the semi-dormant debate about the future of high-speed rail in America, according to an article by Innovation Briefs. The first column, by New York Times correspondent Ron Nixon, casts a sceptical eye on the Administration's high-speed rail program and concludes that "despite the administration spending nearly US$11 billion since 2009....the projects have gone mostly nowhere..." The second column, closely following the first, is an opinion piece by
  • EU approves US$660 billion to transform Europe's transport network
    March 23, 2012
    The EU's Council of transport ministers met in Brussels yesterday and approved a proposal for a new regulation of Trans European Transport – Network (TEN-T) guidelines, in a package for a Connecting Europe Facility. The proposal approved yesterday, and which will cost US$660 billion by 2020 if fully implemented, is aimed at establishing and developing a complete TEN-T, consisting of infrastructure for roads, railways, inland waterways, shipping ports and airports. It also defined a comprehensive network and
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • Kapsch looks to the future
    December 16, 2014
    Colin Sowman reports from a two-day meeting where industry leaders, academics and political advisers presented their thoughts on the future of mobility. Most governments do not dare to introduce tolling systems… they are too frightened.” So said Georg Kapsch in his capacity of chief operating officer of Kapsch TrafficCom, during a forward-looking press event at the company’s headquarters in Vienna.