Skip to main content

Continental: US road deaths are ‘public health crisis’

The 40,000 deaths on US roads last year amount to a ‘public health crisis’, according to Continental North America’s president Jeff Klei. Giving the opening keynote address at ITS America’s 28th Annual Meeting & Expo, Klei said: “If you could save 40,000 lives a year, would you? We believe this situation needs to be treated with the same priority as other health crises in this country.” But help is at hand, he said. The concept of ‘Vision Zero’, where there are no fatalities from crashes, “seems a lon
June 6, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
Jeff Klei of Continental: safety message
The 40,000 deaths on US roads last year amount to a ‘public health crisis’, according to 260 Continental North America’s president Jeff Klei. Giving the opening keynote address at 560 ITS America’s 28th Annual Meeting & Expo, Klei said: “If you could save 40,000 lives a year, would you?


We believe this situation needs to be treated with the same priority as other health crises in this country.”

But help is at hand, he said. The concept of ‘Vision Zero’, where there are no fatalities from crashes, “seems a long way off but it is not as far as you think if we all work together”.

With the technology that is already available “on the shelf” – such as blindspot alert, collision warning and lane assist – 12,000 lives could be saved each year, he insisted. However, drivers tend not to trust newer technology.

For example, seatbelts have been mandated in the US since 1968 and are reckoned to have saved 15,000 lives in 2017 – but Continental’s annual mobility study showed that 77% of respondents last year were worried about the reliability of automated driving.

Klei’s answer is to explain more: “Education leads to trust which leads to consumer acceptance.” Rather than using statistics, the company is taking what it calls a ‘storytelling’ approach which people tend to relate to more.

In addition, Continental is doing more research “to understand new traffic challenges” and, Klei pledged, will continue investing in advanced driver assistance systems and automated tech.

Finally, it is important that safety features are affordable and available to everyone as standard. “Safety is not an ‘option’ for premium segments only,” he concluded. “It should not require a purchaser to check a box.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The path to safer roads: America can learn from Europe’s example, says Verra Mobility
    May 1, 2024
    Many US states are establishing road safety programmes that will inspire others. TJ Tiedje, vice president commercial at Verra Mobility, explains why this is important
  • TRA 2018: Vienna conference highlights
    June 5, 2018
    Digitalisation of transport systems, the regulation of new technologies and more charging points for electric vehicles in cities were among the talking points at this year’s Transport Research Arena conference. Alan Dron sifts through the highlights in Vienna. More than 3,000 transport sector specialists converged on TRA 2018, where the four-day event’s agenda included scores of topics covering regulation, technology and the effect of the digitalisation of road transport systems. Who should control those
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Survey finds drivers trust traditional car makers more than tech companies to build AVs
    May 23, 2017
    Research by connected car services and location analytics provider Inrix indicates that consumers are more likely to trust a traditional car maker than a leading technology company when it comes to making autonomous vehicles (AVs).