Skip to main content

Congress ‘needs a lesson in smart transportation’

Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress. There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has
December 11, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress.

There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has highlighted in that legislation, he said, “then we leave America behind.”

The forum, held at Council Lead Partner 213 Qualcomm’s headquarters in San Diego, was co-sponsored by the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS) Leadership Circle. It featured a host of smart cities experts and public officials speaking on topics critical to cities.

LaHood, who served 14 years in Congress before his appointment as DOT boss, currently serves as co-chair of Building America’s Future, a bi-partisan coalition pushing for infrastructure investment. He told the forum that states are preoccupied with building roads and bridges while cities today are the incubators; they’re the ones implementing advanced technologies.

So it is cities and advocates of smart cities technologies who need to tell Congress what the new transportation bill they will write should include. And it’s not about cars, as young people moving into cities will tell you, he said. Going forward it’s about broad mobility options – and that must be part of the transportation funding debate in Washington. His worry is that it won’t be.

LaHood said Congress needs to provide the resources that will once again make America number one in transportation and number one in innovation “and it will only happen in you get involved,” he told forum participants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Oregon tests new mileage-base charging scheme
    August 5, 2013
    Jack Opiola from D’Artagnan Consulting LLP explains Oregon’s latest moves which mandated a trial of mileage-based road use charging. In 1919, Oregon made the 20th century’s most significant contribution to transportation funding policy, becoming the first state in America to implement a gas tax to pay for roads. This summer Oregon’s Legislature passed, and Governor John Kitzhaber signed into law, Senate Bill 810 which requires a distance-based road usage charge for 5,000 volunteer vehicles by 1 July 2015. T
  • ITSA Detroit 2018: a must-attend transportation event!
    May 24, 2018
    The 2018 ITS America Annual Meeting Detroit, from 4-7 June, is the must-attend transportation technology event in North America this year. The theme of the meeting, “Transportation 2.0,” will be weaved throughout the three days of plenary sessions, demonstrations, and exhibits. Discussions will centre around the future of transportation, intelligent mobility, and managing risk. “Changes happening today will fundamentally affect how people interact with transportation in the months and years ahead,” said Sh
  • Panasonic gets connected on The Ray
    June 5, 2020
    A stretch of rural Georgia highway called The Ray is a particularly useful testbed for V2X technology. Panasonic’s Chris Armstrong tells Adam Hill what’s so special about it
  • Enforcement needs automation and communication
    February 1, 2012
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf