Skip to main content

Congress ‘needs a lesson in smart transportation’

Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress. There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has
December 11, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress.

There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has highlighted in that legislation, he said, “then we leave America behind.”

The forum, held at Council Lead Partner 213 Qualcomm’s headquarters in San Diego, was co-sponsored by the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS) Leadership Circle. It featured a host of smart cities experts and public officials speaking on topics critical to cities.

LaHood, who served 14 years in Congress before his appointment as DOT boss, currently serves as co-chair of Building America’s Future, a bi-partisan coalition pushing for infrastructure investment. He told the forum that states are preoccupied with building roads and bridges while cities today are the incubators; they’re the ones implementing advanced technologies.

So it is cities and advocates of smart cities technologies who need to tell Congress what the new transportation bill they will write should include. And it’s not about cars, as young people moving into cities will tell you, he said. Going forward it’s about broad mobility options – and that must be part of the transportation funding debate in Washington. His worry is that it won’t be.

LaHood said Congress needs to provide the resources that will once again make America number one in transportation and number one in innovation “and it will only happen in you get involved,” he told forum participants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Self-driving car safety perspectives
    June 2, 2015
    At yesterday’s Opening Plenary, Chris Urmson’s keynote speech dealt with the reality of driverless cars on our roads. By far and away their greatest benefit to mankind will be the potential to achieve an incredible saving of life and injury on the roads, as Urmson, director of the Google Self-Driving Car program, revealed to delegates. In response to an Associated Press article last month disclosing that self-driving cars have been involved in four accidents in the state of California, Urmson revealed th
  • Asecap: get ready to rethink everything you know
    November 15, 2022
    How can we make our infrastructure ready for new sustainability challenges? What kind of investments are needed? And who will finance them? Tolling association Asecap has some thoughts. Geoff Hadwick reports from Lisbon
  • Australian road pricing, road funding needs more debate
    January 31, 2012
    Everyone in the road transport industry in Australia is talking road pricing - everyone, that is, except the politicians. Christine Keyes reports. At the end of 2008, Australia's road transport industry was wringing its collective hands, unable to raise more than $100 million from an individual bank for any Public Private Partnership (PPP). The A$750 million Peninsula Link project, announced by the Victoria Government in March 2009, was the first road project in the country to be put out to market as an ava
  • What's next for transport communication systems?
    February 2, 2012
    Moxa Americas, Inc.'s Charles Chen ponders the way forward for transportation communications networks in the US