Skip to main content

Congress ‘needs a lesson in smart transportation’

Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress. There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has
December 11, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress.

There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has highlighted in that legislation, he said, “then we leave America behind.”

The forum, held at Council Lead Partner 213 Qualcomm’s headquarters in San Diego, was co-sponsored by the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS) Leadership Circle. It featured a host of smart cities experts and public officials speaking on topics critical to cities.

LaHood, who served 14 years in Congress before his appointment as DOT boss, currently serves as co-chair of Building America’s Future, a bi-partisan coalition pushing for infrastructure investment. He told the forum that states are preoccupied with building roads and bridges while cities today are the incubators; they’re the ones implementing advanced technologies.

So it is cities and advocates of smart cities technologies who need to tell Congress what the new transportation bill they will write should include. And it’s not about cars, as young people moving into cities will tell you, he said. Going forward it’s about broad mobility options – and that must be part of the transportation funding debate in Washington. His worry is that it won’t be.

LaHood said Congress needs to provide the resources that will once again make America number one in transportation and number one in innovation “and it will only happen in you get involved,” he told forum participants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • C-ITS in Europe: It’s the governance, stupid!
    March 3, 2023
    Cooperative ITS (C-ITS) is coming – in fact, it’s already here. But who has responsibility for making it work? Richard Lax of Kapsch TrafficCom thinks there are lessons to be learned from the European experience
  • Valuing ITS
    February 6, 2012
    Politicians, policy- and decision-makers need no-nonsense, non-technical answers on which to base investments in ITS. The International Benefits, Evaluation and Costs (IBEC) Working Group can provide them, says its Chair, Richard Harris
  • Valuing ITS
    February 2, 2012
    Politicians, policy- and decision-makers need no-nonsense, non-technical answers on which to base investments in ITS. The International Benefits, Evaluation and Costs (IBEC) Working Group can provide them, says its Chair, Richard Harris
  • From coast to coast: US states embrace automated enforcement for safer roads, says Verra Mobility
    September 12, 2023
    The concept of Vision Zero has hit a pothole in the US – but there is hope for a safer future, says Jon Baldwin, executive vice president, government solutions, at Verra Mobility