Skip to main content

Congress ‘needs a lesson in smart transportation’

Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress. There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has
December 11, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Former US transportation secretary Ray LaHood says Congress needs to learn there’s more to transportation funding in the 21st century than building more roads and bridges. He urged smart transportation advocates attending the Smart City Council’s Smart Cities Now forum in San Diego this week to take their message to Congress.

There are new people in Congress who are going to write a transportation bill, LaHood suggested, and if they don’t incorporate all of the smart technologies that the forum has highlighted in that legislation, he said, “then we leave America behind.”

The forum, held at Council Lead Partner 213 Qualcomm’s headquarters in San Diego, was co-sponsored by the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS) Leadership Circle. It featured a host of smart cities experts and public officials speaking on topics critical to cities.

LaHood, who served 14 years in Congress before his appointment as DOT boss, currently serves as co-chair of Building America’s Future, a bi-partisan coalition pushing for infrastructure investment. He told the forum that states are preoccupied with building roads and bridges while cities today are the incubators; they’re the ones implementing advanced technologies.

So it is cities and advocates of smart cities technologies who need to tell Congress what the new transportation bill they will write should include. And it’s not about cars, as young people moving into cities will tell you, he said. Going forward it’s about broad mobility options – and that must be part of the transportation funding debate in Washington. His worry is that it won’t be.

LaHood said Congress needs to provide the resources that will once again make America number one in transportation and number one in innovation “and it will only happen in you get involved,” he told forum participants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • MaaS: 130,000 chances for a bad user experience
    May 4, 2020
    Johan Herrlin, CEO of transit data specialist Ito World, puts himself in the hotseat with ITS International to talk about, among other things, why a beautifully designed MaaS app with a perfect subscription model is still a failure if you get your customers lost along the way
  • ITS benefits escape public
    June 8, 2015
    John Kendall considers the public’s awareness of the benefits of ITS. While the results of developing ITS technology may be clear to readers of ITS International, there is far less evidence that drivers have any appreciation of what the technology is doing for them. So how aware are drivers of the developments that are designed to make their journeys less congested and safer?
  • New IBTTA boss defends DEI initiatives: 'I firmly believe our values don’t change'
    January 24, 2025
    Kathryn Clay insists: 'It's not a political costume you put on when it’s convenient'
  • ITS needs to talk the talk as well as walk the walk
    March 24, 2014
    The US automated enforcement market is in rude health as the number of systems and applications continues to grow and broaden. Jason Barnes reports. Blessed and cursed – arguably, in equal measure – with a constitution which stresses the right to self-expression and determination, the US has had a harder journey than most to the more widespread use of automated traffic enforcement systems. In some cases, opposition to the concept has been extreme – including the murder of a roadside civil enforcement offici