Skip to main content

Congestion up globally says TomTom

According to TomTom’s latest Traffic Index, traffic congestion has increased 13 per cent globally since 2008. But there are big differences between continents; while North America’s traffic congestion has jumped by 17 per cent, Europe has risen just two per cent. TomTom believe the contrasts probably are driven by economic growth in North America and financial troubles in the many parts of Europe. In particular, some countries have recorded a marked drop in traffic over the past eight years, including It
March 23, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
According to 1692 TomTom’s latest Traffic Index, traffic congestion has increased 13 per cent globally since 2008. But there are big differences between continents; while North America’s traffic congestion has jumped by 17 per cent, Europe has risen just two per cent.

TomTom believe the contrasts probably are driven by economic growth in North America and financial troubles in the many parts of Europe. In particular, some countries have recorded a marked drop in traffic over the past eight years, including Italy, which saw a drop of seven per cent and span with a drop of 13 per cent.

Using data from 2015, the TomTom Traffic Index assessed traffic congestion in 295 major cities in 38 countries on six continents, from Rome to Rio, Singapore to San Antonio.

Globally, Istanbul has been knocked off the top spot by Mexico City.  Commuters in the Mexican capital can expect to spend 59 per cent extra travel time stuck in traffic during the day, rising to 94 per cent in the evening peak period – a total of 219 wasted hours a year.   

The next most congested big cities worldwide are Bangkok (57 per cent), Istanbul (50 per cent), Rio de Janeiro (47 per cent) and Moscow (44 per cent).

In North America, Mexico City ranked number one with an overall congestion level of 59 per cent, followed by Los Angeles at 41 per cent, ahead of San Francisco, Vancouver, New York, Seattle, San Jose, Toronto, Honolulu and Miami. Drivers in some cities even enjoyed a reduction in traffic congestion from last year, including Las Vegas, Denver, Tucson, St Louis, Detroit, Minneapolis and Milwaukee.

Moscow ranked highest in Europe, with a congestion level of 44 per cent, followed by Bucharest at 43 per cent, Saint Petersburg, Warsaw, Rome, London, Marseilles, Manchester, Athens and Paris.

According to Ralf-Peter Schaefer, vice-president of TomTom Traffic, transport authorities are managing congestion with well-engineered policies, but people aren’t doing enough to change their travel habits - such as working flexible hours, avoiding peak commuting times, making use of real–time traffic information and trying alternative travel modes.

“If only five per cent of us changed our travel plans, we could improve traffic congestion on our main roads by up to thirty per cent,” he said.

Related Content

  • October 12, 2016
    Tomtom offers authorities sensor-free traffic monitoring
    Tomtom City, a traffic information and analytics package designed to help authorities monitor road conditions without the need for roadside infrastructure, is on display on Tomtom’s stand at this week’s ITS World Congress. The company collects data from 450 million connected devices worldwide (6% of Australian vehicles or occupants have a connected device) to determine vehicle speeds, congestion levels and incidents on most roads – and not just those in urban areas. Authorities using City can monitor traf
  • April 13, 2023
    Asia-Pacific & Europe dominate Smart City Index 2023
    New York is highest-ranked US city (22nd) with Cairo the leading African city (108th)
  • May 26, 2015
    Göteborg congestion charge hailed a success
    A new analysis of Göteborg's congestion pricing program suggests that it has been effective in cutting traffic congestion and contributed to more commuters taking public transport. The authors of the analysis, Maria Börjesson and Ida Kristoffersson, say that the examples of Göteborg and the Swedish capital Stockholm prove the advantages of road pricing for cities of varying size and density.
  • May 6, 2015
    Countering congestion’s cost
    A new report on the economic costs of traffic congestion predicts the problem will worsen significantly in future. Jon Masters reviews the figures and some suggested solutions. New figures on the rising economic and environmental costs of congestion have been published by the US traffic data specialist Inrix and the UK’s Centre for Economics & Business Research (Cebr). Their report finds the problem much bigger than previously thought.