Skip to main content

CIHT welcomes NAO report on roads infrastructure funding

The UK’s Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation (CIHT) has welcomed the National Audit Office’s (NAO) report, Maintaining strategic infrastructure: roads, which highlights how long term funding certainty is crucial to how the UK manages its road infrastructure. Funding pressures on highways authorities have encouraged efficiency and innovation in how budgets for road maintenance are spent, but public value will be lost unless funding becomes more predictable, according to the report. The r
June 9, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The UK’s Chartered Institution of Highways & Transportation (CIHT) has welcomed the National Audit Office’s (NAO) report, Maintaining strategic infrastructure: roads, which highlights how long term funding certainty is crucial to how the UK manages its road infrastructure.

Funding pressures on highways authorities have encouraged efficiency and innovation in how budgets for road maintenance are spent, but public value will be lost unless funding becomes more predictable, according to the report.

The report by the NAO also welcomes the six-year funding certainty outlined in the government’s Infrastructure Bill provided for capital projects and maintenance, and therefore the potential to achieve better value for money.

“Stop/start funding makes long-term planning more difficult for highways authorities. The 1837 Department for Transport understands the threat posed to road maintenance from the uncertainty of funding, but establishing a new government company to address the problems will not, in itself, be enough. The Department should work with the Treasury and the Department for Communities and Local Government to address the unpredictability of funding for both the strategic and local road networks,” says Amyas Morse, head of the National Audit Office.

Andrew Hugill, CIHT director of Policy and Technical Affairs commented: “We have consistently called for a need for certainty, and continuity of investment over a sustained period if overall improvements to the transport network are to be delivered effectively and efficiently. Giving certainty to the entire transport sector, including skills, resources and the investment needed for effective delivery will result in benefits to health, environmental, social as well as economic agendas.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Smart cities: first, define your strategy
    April 27, 2020
    How smart are we really being about smart mobility? Martin Howell of Worldline UK and Ireland reckons we could do better – but to do so you have to start asking the right questions…
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of
  • Asecap debates the future of tolling
    August 23, 2016
    Colin Sowman reports form Asecap’s Study & Information Days event in Madrid. At Asecap’s (the Association of European Toll Road Operators) recent Study and Information Days event there was no doubt about the subject at the top of the agenda: the European Union Directive 23/2014/EU. This will introduce fundamental changes to the concession model under which Asecap members operate more than 50,000km of tolled highways and, in response, it has compiled a report entitled Proposal for a Sustainable Concession Mo
  • Government needs to support ultra low emission HGV market as well
    September 2, 2016
    The Freight Transport Association has reacted positively to a new report from the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee into sustainability in transport policy. In the report, the Committee states that fiscal support will be needed along with regulatory reform to develop the market in ultra-low emission vehicles. For cars it suggests reform to company car taxation, and for vans a reform to the weight limitations on alternatively powered vehicles.