Skip to main content

C/AV integration is ‘legislative nightmare’, warns ITS UK president

The integration of connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AV) into existing road systems “is going to be a legislative nightmare”, warned a former UK government transport minister. Giving the keynote speech at this week’s MaaSMarket conference in London, ITS UK president Steven Norris, said: “Don’t underestimate the legislative challenges – which are infinitely more complex than the technical ones. I can’t think of any development in human history which has posed so many legislative questions.” Chief among
February 23, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

The integration of connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AV) into existing road systems “is going to be a legislative nightmare”, warned a former UK government transport minister. Giving the keynote speech at this week’s MaaSMarket conference in London, ITS UK president Steven Norris, said: “Don’t underestimate the legislative challenges – which are infinitely more complex than the technical ones. I can’t think of any development in human history which has posed so many legislative questions.” Chief among these were at what point - and how - C/AV should be integrated into the ‘driver-driven’ fleet. “I would hate to be in the position of a legislature that had to make that choice,” Norris suggested. He said other problems include: how C/AV will fit in with pedestrians and cyclists in urban areas; who would be liable for damages in accidents involving C/AVs; how autonomous vehicles would be programmed to prioritise who to save – for example, a pedestrian child, another road user or the passenger – in the event of a collision; plus when ‘driven’ vehicles would be prohibited from the streets. “I don’t think we are even close to deciding what the parameters of the debate are, let alone coming to any conclusions,” he said. Norris, who was a transport minister in the Conservative government of the early 1990s, also predicted that answers will not come quickly, pointing to the delay in expanding the UK’s airport capacity. “Here’s my tip,” he said to the MaaSMarket audience. “We’ve known we’ve needed an additional runway for 35 years – we still haven’t decided where it’s going to be. Some of you are going to get very, very, very old before all the legal questions around C/AV are even addressed.”

Related Content

  • April 3, 2019
    MaaS data reveals shared ride potential
    “Origin/destination information derived from MaaS-style operations could be the key to reducing future gridlock caused by autonomous vehicles.” That was the message RideFlag’s chief technology officer Mark Feltham delivered to the IBTTA’s Annual Technology Summit in Orlando. “Once they have removed the costly driver, Uber and Lyft will be able to offer very affordable rides, tempting people doing long commutes on transit to pay those few extra dollars to take an Uber. The combination of long distance co
  • June 4, 2015
    Autonomous vehicles a double-edged sword?
    Welcome to our 20th Anniversary special edition. Over the past two decades ITS International has reported the trials and tribulations of ITS as it has progressively reduced congestion, emissions and journey times and improved road safety. Indeed many believe the sector is currently ‘living the dream’.
  • March 3, 2020
    How safe are smart motorways?
    A valiant attempt to ease the UK’s congested strategic road system? Or an idea that should never have seen the light of day? Alan Dron reports on the controversy over smart motorways...
  • January 14, 2020
    Trust AI – it knows more than we do
    There’s no shortage of data – but making the most of it is the problem. Andrew Bunn examines how AI will be able to support and influence the development of advanced transportation strategies