Skip to main content

Carpooling - a simple solution for congestion

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.
July 10, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.

The research indicates that in Jakarta, Indonesia, after an HOV policy requiring three or more passengers in a car was discontinued on important city centre roads, travel delays became 46 per cent worse during the morning rush hour and 87 per cent worse during the evening rush hour.

At the same time, traffic suddenly became significantly worse on surrounding roads as well. Instead of siphoning more traffic onto the central roads, the policy change made congestion worse everywhere.

Jakarta installed its HOV regulations in 1992, in an effort to reduce its notoriously bad traffic problems, using a ‘three-in-one’ policy that required three passengers in each vehicle on some major roads, between 7 and 10 am and between 4.30 and 7 pm. It scrapped the policy in 2016, first for a week, then for a month and then permanently.

The researchers examined traffic-speed data from Jakarta from a week prior to the abolishing of its three-passenger policy, in late March 2016, to a month afterwards. Using data from Google Maps APIs for major roads in Jakarta, they measured travel delays, calculated from the time needed to travel one kilometre compared to the free-flow speed of the road.

After the HOV policy was abandoned, the research showed the average speed of Jakarta’s rush hour traffic declined from about 17 to 12 miles per hour in the mornings, and from about 13 to seven miles per hour in the evenings. By comparison, people usually walk at around three miles per hour.

“Eliminating high-occupancy vehicle restrictions led to substantially worse traffic,” says Ben Olken, a professor of economics at MIT and co-author of the paper detailing the study. “That’s not shocking, but the magnitudes are just enormous.”

 “HOV policies on central roads were making traffic everywhere better, both during the middle of the day and on these other roads during rush hour,” Olken observes. “That I think is a really striking result.”

The paper, Citywide effects of high-occupancy vehicle restrictions: Evidence from ‘three-in-one’ in Jakarta, is published in the journal Science.

Related Content

  • February 20, 2019
    Road death toll increasing in poor countries, says WHO report
    The latest figures from the World Health Organisation on road deaths make sobering reading – but they are particularly shocking when you consider how the relative poverty of countries contributes to high fatality rates, says Adam Hill Around 1.35 million people died on the world’s roads in 2016, while road traffic injuries are now the leading cause of death among young people, according to new statistics from the World Health Organisation (WHO). Perhaps the most sobering point from its latest research
  • February 16, 2024
    'Significant and universal decline' in walking in the US: StreetLight Data
    Walking has declined over the last three years in the US – yet pedestrian fatalities have been rising. Adam Hill looks at new research from StreetLight Data to find out why this is happening
  • March 17, 2014
    Proposed system to take guesswork out of choosing a freeway lane
    A fledgling advanced lane management assist system can take the guesswork out of selecting the right lane on a congested freeway, as its inventor Robert Gordon explains. As drivers we’ve all done it and control room staff see it all the time – motorists on congested freeways switching into what they perceive is a faster lane, only to come to a halt a few moments later and watch vehicles in the other lanes continue to move past. Now, by re-analysing readily available data in an advanced lane management as
  • June 3, 2015
    Distraction dominated teen driver accident causes.
    As a new report shows that distracted driving is a bigger cause of accidents than previously thought, Jon Masters asks what should be done to counter this problem. Research carried out by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has shed new light on the dangers of distraction for teen drivers. Six years of study using video analysis has shown that 58% of all crashes involving teen drivers are caused by the driver being distracted and proved that the influence of external factors is stronger than previously th