Carpooling - a simple solution for congestion

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.
July 10, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.

The research indicates that in Jakarta, Indonesia, after an HOV policy requiring three or more passengers in a car was discontinued on important city centre roads, travel delays became 46 per cent worse during the morning rush hour and 87 per cent worse during the evening rush hour.

At the same time, traffic suddenly became significantly worse on surrounding roads as well. Instead of siphoning more traffic onto the central roads, the policy change made congestion worse everywhere.

Jakarta installed its HOV regulations in 1992, in an effort to reduce its notoriously bad traffic problems, using a ‘three-in-one’ policy that required three passengers in each vehicle on some major roads, between 7 and 10 am and between 4.30 and 7 pm. It scrapped the policy in 2016, first for a week, then for a month and then permanently.

The researchers examined traffic-speed data from Jakarta from a week prior to the abolishing of its three-passenger policy, in late March 2016, to a month afterwards. Using data from Google Maps APIs for major roads in Jakarta, they measured travel delays, calculated from the time needed to travel one kilometre compared to the free-flow speed of the road.

After the HOV policy was abandoned, the research showed the average speed of Jakarta’s rush hour traffic declined from about 17 to 12 miles per hour in the mornings, and from about 13 to seven miles per hour in the evenings. By comparison, people usually walk at around three miles per hour.

“Eliminating high-occupancy vehicle restrictions led to substantially worse traffic,” says Ben Olken, a professor of economics at MIT and co-author of the paper detailing the study. “That’s not shocking, but the magnitudes are just enormous.”

 “HOV policies on central roads were making traffic everywhere better, both during the middle of the day and on these other roads during rush hour,” Olken observes. “That I think is a really striking result.”

The paper, Citywide effects of high-occupancy vehicle restrictions: Evidence from ‘three-in-one’ in Jakarta, is published in the journal Science.

Related Content

  • August 29, 2019
    Don’t drive drunk – or use a hands-free phone
    Despite law changes, drivers’ bad habits have been creeping back in. TRL’s Dr Shaun Helman tells Adam Hill why using a phone at the wheel is just as distracting as driving after a few drinks esearch from as far back as 2002 (see box) suggests that driving while making a phone call – either hands-free or holding a handset to your ear – creates the same amount of distraction as being drunk behind the wheel. While it is notoriously hard to predict how alcohol will affect an individual (due to the speed of
    Read More
  • September 16, 2013
    Study finds support for toll express lanes, less for mileage charges
    A new report by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (MWCOG) finds that support for a toll managed lanes network grows somewhat the more it is discussed, whereas a vehicle miles travelled charge loses support after discussion. Among 300 people who participated in five-hour moderated small group discussions of alternative ways of dealing with traffic congestion in the Washington DC metro area, toll express lanes on all major highways receiv
    Read More
  • May 22, 2014
    ‘Risky tailgating and speeding rife on UK motorways’
    Six in ten UK drivers own up to risky tailgating (57 per cent) and a similar proportion break the limit by 10mph or more (60 per cent) on motorways and 70mph dual carriageways, with men by far the worst offenders, a survey by Brake and insurance company Direct Line reveals. Almost all drivers say they worry about other drivers tailgating on motorways: 95 per cent are at least occasionally concerned about vehicles too close behind them; more than four in ten (44 per cent) are concerned every, or most, tim
    Read More
  • January 23, 2018
    Zendrive: lunchtime driving in San Francisco riskier than rush hour
    Lunch-hour driving across the San Francisco Bay Area between 11.00am and 2.00pm is riskier than morning and evening rush hour commutes with more than 50% of routes presenting a greater risk to drivers during lunch hour. These latest findings come from Zendrive’s Bay Area Commute Safety Snapshot which also revealed that the San Mateo Bridge is overall more dangerous during morning commutes between 6.00am to 11.00am.
    Read More

Highlighted Content