Skip to main content

Carpooling - a simple solution for congestion

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.
July 10, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.

The research indicates that in Jakarta, Indonesia, after an HOV policy requiring three or more passengers in a car was discontinued on important city centre roads, travel delays became 46 per cent worse during the morning rush hour and 87 per cent worse during the evening rush hour.

At the same time, traffic suddenly became significantly worse on surrounding roads as well. Instead of siphoning more traffic onto the central roads, the policy change made congestion worse everywhere.

Jakarta installed its HOV regulations in 1992, in an effort to reduce its notoriously bad traffic problems, using a ‘three-in-one’ policy that required three passengers in each vehicle on some major roads, between 7 and 10 am and between 4.30 and 7 pm. It scrapped the policy in 2016, first for a week, then for a month and then permanently.

The researchers examined traffic-speed data from Jakarta from a week prior to the abolishing of its three-passenger policy, in late March 2016, to a month afterwards. Using data from Google Maps APIs for major roads in Jakarta, they measured travel delays, calculated from the time needed to travel one kilometre compared to the free-flow speed of the road.

After the HOV policy was abandoned, the research showed the average speed of Jakarta’s rush hour traffic declined from about 17 to 12 miles per hour in the mornings, and from about 13 to seven miles per hour in the evenings. By comparison, people usually walk at around three miles per hour.

“Eliminating high-occupancy vehicle restrictions led to substantially worse traffic,” says Ben Olken, a professor of economics at MIT and co-author of the paper detailing the study. “That’s not shocking, but the magnitudes are just enormous.”

 “HOV policies on central roads were making traffic everywhere better, both during the middle of the day and on these other roads during rush hour,” Olken observes. “That I think is a really striking result.”

The paper, Citywide effects of high-occupancy vehicle restrictions: Evidence from ‘three-in-one’ in Jakarta, is published in the journal Science.

Related Content

  • June 14, 2022
    Visible enforcement makes roads safer: study
    US research shows that high visibility is factor in reducing dangerous driving behaviours
  • June 2, 2015
    Study finds rumble strips save lives on rural highways
    A recently completed study shows that rumble strips are proving to be an effective and low-cost way to reduce crashes on Michigan's state highways. The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) started a major rumble strip program for two-lane high-speed rural highways in 2008. Centre-line and shoulder rumble strips were installed on all MDOT rural, non-freeway highways with posted speed limits of 55 mph and appropriate paved lane and shoulder widths. To date, 5,700 miles of centre-line rumble strips
  • July 31, 2014
    News Test
    News Test
  • May 12, 2014
    New research finds distracted driving on the rise on I-95
    Transurban-Fluor and AAA Mid-Atlantic have released the second annual report on distracted drivers on I-95 in Northern Virginia, which found that despite major construction, distracted driving is a growing problem on the heavily travelled corridor. The report, part of the Orange Cones, No Phones campaign focused on reducing distracted driving in the 95 Express Lanes construction zone, found that the number of frequent I-95 drivers likely to use their cell phone while driving has increased from 56 percent i