Skip to main content

Carpooling - a simple solution for congestion

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.
July 10, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

Cities plagued with terrible traffic problems may be overlooking a simple, low-cost solution: high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) policies that encourage carpooling can drastically reduce traffic, according to a new study co-authored by 2024 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University researchers.

The research indicates that in Jakarta, Indonesia, after an HOV policy requiring three or more passengers in a car was discontinued on important city centre roads, travel delays became 46 per cent worse during the morning rush hour and 87 per cent worse during the evening rush hour.

At the same time, traffic suddenly became significantly worse on surrounding roads as well. Instead of siphoning more traffic onto the central roads, the policy change made congestion worse everywhere.

Jakarta installed its HOV regulations in 1992, in an effort to reduce its notoriously bad traffic problems, using a ‘three-in-one’ policy that required three passengers in each vehicle on some major roads, between 7 and 10 am and between 4.30 and 7 pm. It scrapped the policy in 2016, first for a week, then for a month and then permanently.

The researchers examined traffic-speed data from Jakarta from a week prior to the abolishing of its three-passenger policy, in late March 2016, to a month afterwards. Using data from Google Maps APIs for major roads in Jakarta, they measured travel delays, calculated from the time needed to travel one kilometre compared to the free-flow speed of the road.

After the HOV policy was abandoned, the research showed the average speed of Jakarta’s rush hour traffic declined from about 17 to 12 miles per hour in the mornings, and from about 13 to seven miles per hour in the evenings. By comparison, people usually walk at around three miles per hour.

“Eliminating high-occupancy vehicle restrictions led to substantially worse traffic,” says Ben Olken, a professor of economics at MIT and co-author of the paper detailing the study. “That’s not shocking, but the magnitudes are just enormous.”

 “HOV policies on central roads were making traffic everywhere better, both during the middle of the day and on these other roads during rush hour,” Olken observes. “That I think is a really striking result.”

The paper, Citywide effects of high-occupancy vehicle restrictions: Evidence from ‘three-in-one’ in Jakarta, is published in the journal Science.

Related Content

  • March 23, 2015
    I-80 Smart Corridor sets the ITS standard for California's Bay Area
    Colin Sowman looks at California’s ‘smartest’ road which will open this spring to counter congestion and accidents on one of the Bay Area’s busiest interstates. Interstate 80 (I-80) is one of the busiest roads in the San Francisco Bay area with up to 270,000 vehicles using the corridor every day. The section between the Carquinez Bridge in Crockett and the Bay Bridge not only suffers congestion during the working week but also at weekends. Traditional remedies such as building additional lanes (there are al
  • January 25, 2012
    US congestion costs continue to rise
    The 2010 Urban Mobility Report, published by the Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M University, concludes that after two years of slight declines in overall traffic congestion - attributable to the economic downturn and high fuel prices - leading indicators suggest that as the economy rebounds, traffic problems are doing the same. While 2008 was the best year for commuters in at least a decade, the problem again began to grow in 2009.
  • December 16, 2013
    Policy decisions are ‘key determinant for more sustainable transport’
    The volume of global transport could double or even quadruple by 2050, according to a new study released by the International Transport Forum (ITF). GDP growth, freight intensity of economic activity and demographic change are important drivers of this growth, but key determinants for the level of future increases are policy choices, according to the ITF Transport Outlook: a report containing long-run scenarios for global transport activity and related CO2 emissions. China and India drive transport volu
  • April 2, 2024
    No city is a traffic island
    Beate Kubitz reflects on the rising tide of suburban drivers - and how cities across Europe are dealing with them as worries over air quality multiply